Sir, our fertility rate has come down to 2.1 (births per woman) from 3.35 (birth per woman) in 2 decades which is a massive decline but it won't seem like it because you need a couple of decades to see it full effect.
2.1 is the replacement rate of population. That means the population is going to be stable in the near future and might start to decline if we have lower fertility rate. (takes a long time to notice, but a declining population is much much worse than growing population)
Large Population is not a bad thing unlike most people thinks...ask countries with the brink of population decline, they are going to be facing massive problems. We are at the sweet spot with large young population.
We need a massive infrastructure spending no doubt about it. But it can be done gradually until then we have to face some long queue and waiting lines.
We can close the gap!
(Sorry for jumping in the discussion, I wanted to put my point across, interesting discussion though)
!LUV
!PIZZA
@sanjeevm, @pravesh0(6/10) sent LUV. | connect | community | HiveWiki | NFT | <>< daily
! help
(no space) to get help on Hive. Info