A paradigm-shift is needed. The problem is systemic -- we are relying far too heavily on centralized rather than decentralized solutions, and part of that is because of the current way the 'rules of the game' are structured. I do not have a problem per se with the DHF paying for anti-spam efforts.
I am too swamped to post about it today, but I will do so in the near future. I will tag you and you will, of course, be welcome to provide feedback and to argue (for or) against any changes I propose.
"I am too swamped to post about it today, but I will do so in the near future."
Having written about this myself, I would welcome a link / tag to it, once complete. While we have not "talked" directly much, I respect your views / opinion.
Very good. I followed your account a long time ago, so it should also appear in my feed. But, I welcome being tagged / linked in your post, as extra assurance I will see it, should you remember.
A paradigm-shift is needed. The problem is systemic -- we are relying far too heavily on centralized rather than decentralized solutions, and part of that is because of the current way the 'rules of the game' are structured. I do not have a problem per se with the DHF paying for anti-spam efforts.
I am too swamped to post about it today, but I will do so in the near future. I will tag you and you will, of course, be welcome to provide feedback and to argue (for or) against any changes I propose.
Just this morning seeing this, @trostparadox:
Having written about this myself, I would welcome a link / tag to it, once complete. While we have not "talked" directly much, I respect your views / opinion.
Thank you!
I’ll try to remember to tag you once I get my thoughts ready to post.
Very good. I followed your account a long time ago, so it should also appear in my feed. But, I welcome being tagged / linked in your post, as extra assurance I will see it, should you remember.
Either way, it will be fine.
Thanks again!