What force is it that defines the direction things buoy in...? In zero-G, You can put water on a piece of wood, and the water will flow around the wood until You have a bubble of water with a piece of wood in the middle.
I call that force "gravity."
What is mis-grasped is the nature of that force - it is part of the electro-gravito-magnetic makeup of the universe.
And I ponder that Japanese experiment. I wonder which direction works south of the equator....
Yep, we call it "gravity". The problem is "gravity as a result of mass" has taken over that word.
A lot of the future words will include things like buoyancy.
And we will have things, often massive things, that just float in the air. And we will have to be very careful with our words weight and mass and the difference there of.
Not sure if You recall (or were even aware) that I advocate for electrogravitics to be unhidden. Given it allows gravity control, it's pretty clear gravity is not what the einsteinians want Us to think it is. LOL! I'm a lavioletteian... I support the work of the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette - subquantum kinetics (SQK), which predicts all the "mysteries" of the einsteinian bunk (like the Biefeld-Brown effect), needs no "renormalizations" and ad hoc things like "dark matter" and "dark energy" to explain things, and... Is euclidean! No "bending of spacetime.
In that view, gravity, as I mentioned, is a force, with both negative and positive elements that nearly, but not quite, cancel one another out, leaving the appearance that it is a "weak" force.
In case I have not offered:
SQK: https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
Electrogravitics PDF: https://starburstfound.org/downloads/aerospace/NASA-SEOP.pdf
And:
Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of-free-energy
One big problem is that the universe is non-euclidian. The only thing that Einstein got right is that the universe is curved.
The right hand rule of electricity is Electricity - Magnetism - Force. That force is probably what we feel as gravity.
There is a right h and rule of aether, and we really need to know both in order to understand energy.
I dispute that the universe is bent. What brings You to that conclusion? SQK explains why things behave as they do without the need to bend things.
As for the rest, likely!
Ummm, you know the shape of a magnetic field?
You know the shape of a human aura?
This shape is repeated throughout the universe.
Yes. But I don't see how that leads to "...the universe is non-euclidian. The only thing that Einstein got right is that the universe is curved."