You now want to tell me what to do, after you thought that I don't understand extinction. You go from one retarded approach, to another one. Before that you assumed that I'm defending "wanting extinction" because I ridiculed your approach, and then you want to claim that I don't understand what extinction means, now you think I should join, kinda all over the place. What now retard, will you respond to how you approached this, how seemingly unconcerned with extending any consideration, at all, and then how much you assumed about me, and how much you avoided and how contorted your direction has been? Its a rhetorical question btw..
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: