I'm sure you think its retarded to call your idiocy, as retarded, but if it is, why don't you explain why or how what I did was Retarded and how that is different from you calling the idea as retarded, for the nth time, without any explanation, or you think this explains anything:
The matter of life is not extinction but even more life.
Death, is a part of life, as is destruction. So to say that extinction, which has claimed magnitudes(10000x) of lifeforms more than what we have today, is not life, but that even more life is "the matter of life", doesn't make Any sense, as if death, extinction and all else, is not Life as well.
This is how one would begin to argue:
The matter with thinking that Human Extinction is necessary for life to continue is that..
Then you go into the necessary details to demonstrate or illustrate how and why thinking that human extinction is necessary for life to continue, is wrong or Sick as you claim.
So extinction means that life is retarded and cant or doesnt want more life.
No idiot. You have to inquire as to WHY these people choose to believe what they claim, or to at least understand that, for yourself, otherwise, to your idiot no consideration self, of course "wanting extinction" is Retarded. You can't debate with me as to this idea, because I don't care to and there are plenty of people who, should you chose to want to understand for yourself as to why they believe that, you can inquire them for their beliefs, and then you can Form your opinion on if it's Sick or Retarded. Don't expect that from your no consideration self, you seem resolute with avoiding at all costs Substantiation.