I don't really read the news very often because I don't believe that almost any of it is going to have any sort of facts in it. Mostly I think that news these days has become targeted advertising to people that already believe in a certain "product" with the product being a certain political way of thinking. This is true in most people's lives regardless of where they stand on certain issues. I think that people could actually be better free-thinkers if they were simply to listen to another point of view that is contrary to their own in a calm and sane manner. But we don't get very much of that anymore do we? Everything is loaded or is lied about and the media is largely responsible for this and yes, I mean conservative media as well.
With the recent Kansas City shooting the identity of the shooters was initially withheld from the public and they have a ton of excuses as to why that is but I think all of us know the reason why that is: It is because the shooters were black.
src
While I do not watch his show I was fwd a clip of Anne Coulter making a comment on Bill Maher's show and they were discussing the fact that the media was withholding the identity of the suspects and she simply said "if they were white we would already know." Sadly, I think that everyone can say that this is definitely the case. The media has this apparent objective to portray white people as violent and black people as the opposite. Both races and all others are capable of violence so why is there such a focus on one and not the other?
The media initially stated that they were unable to release the suspect's identity because he was a minor. But that didn't really stop the media from identifying other minors that you might have heard of
src
Remember this guy? Well he was a minor at the time and the media didn't really concern themselves with that in this situation now did they? In fact, the media did everything they possibly could to vilify this kid any chance that they got. He was made to look guilty by the media for months until eventually he was found not guilty on all charges in a court of law. I don't know if he sued any of the media for what they did to him, but I certainly hope so.
There was also that 9-year old kid who had facepaint on at a Kansas City Chiefs game and the media didn't seem all that concerned that he was not only a minor, but also completely innocent of all that they were accusing him of.
src
Not only did they use a minor in a story that went viral, albeit mostly for the sake of attacking the media for being idiots, but they found out who he is and published his name. This was a deliberate attempt to ruin this kid's life and for what? Because he puts some facepaint on to go to a football game? The media desperately wanted to try to make this kid out to be racist.. thankfully they failed miserably at this.
To get back to the Kansas City parade shooting, as it turns out, the shooters weren't even minors and I suspect the media was aware of this all along.
src
Lyndell Mays is 23 years old... just a mere 5 years from being a minor. The other guy was 18.
They can make all the excuses they want but the fact of the matter here is that the media has some sort of strange objective to expose white people for crimes or event fabricate "crimes" they have committed and to hide the crimes of minorities and bury them like they never happened. I sincerely hope that most people out there are smart enough to see through this crap.
If you knew nothing about America and had no idea what it was like to live there and relied entirely on the news to get an understanding about crime over there a person would have no choice but to just assume that white people are terrible and the minorities are constantly living in fear of them. That isn't the case at all.
Just look at the quote from one of the most famous civil-rights activists in American history
src
I don't want to make anyone or any race out to be the "bad guys" but is it really so much to ask for the media to not have an objective based on lies to create this false narrative? I suppose expecting any honesty out of the MSM is really too much to ask at this point since we have achieved the "full retard" point in our media history in USA.
The answers to your question lies in who controls the media and what their agenda is. That's why a 12% minority can commit 60% of murders and the media obscures it but a little native American boy can't wear a headdress without being attacked. So who owns and controls the MSM?
I often wonder if this is the way that it has always been but the average viewer like you and I are just now becoming aware of it because we have full access to everything and are not just limited what is decided to be shown to us on TV and in newspapers.
Their objective is to actually drive UP racial divides?
100% they discovered during the Travon Martin thing that they could make profit and get a lot of clicks and viewers by openly promoting racial animus. If you look at the chart of rates of racial harmony they peaked right about the time Obama was elected and then started to free fall with the Martin case and then got worse with every racial incident they manufactured. To be fair though a certain 2% minority has always had control of Hollywood as long as it has been a thing. Look at how every show and commercial is chock full of homosexuals and miscegenation, it's not an accident. The goal is to eliminate white people entirely and destroy America.
well if so many people keep towing the line and allowing it, they will succeed. I have said many times before that I wouldn't mind at all if USA broke into 2 or more countries at this point. I would vote for it.
The problem with that is the split isn't really geographic, as much as they talk about "red states" and "blue states" in reality only the urban areas are blue and the suburbs and rural areas are not. Realistically they have already achieved their goal and it's just a matter of time. White children 17 and younger in America are already a minority.
sure. If you look at a "red and blue" map of the counties in even places like California and New York that can be depended on to always vote blue, the map is overwhelmingly red in terms of geographical coverage.
It is all part of their racial agenda and it is pathetic and feeble because it is that obvious. Skin color should play no part in this, but they are taking racism to another level by protecting one side and it will back fire.
I think it already has backfired and this is a good thing. I don't know very many people who pay much attention to the media and the ones that do... well let's just say they aren't exactly the scholars at the Elks Lodge.
I just wonder what the true objective of the racial agenda is. like what is the endgame?
We sure have. I skim the NYTimes daily, mostly to see what absurdities we are being told today. Surrealism reigns! I like playing wordle though.
I don't watch any TV news (or very rarely I should say) and I don't know who those two kids you showed us pictures are. The first one looks familiar (maybe he's the kid from Charlotte?), the painted kid I have no idea at all. Poor kids will have been traumatized for life. The media has no qualms about traumatizing white kids.
One of my daughters, who is a very fair and intelligent person, recently had to choose between a white carpenter and a hispanic carpenter. The white guy was clearly a better choice for her (certified, more communicative, less expensive, available when she needed the work done), but she agonized over the decision, afraid she had to choose the hispanic guy or she would be being racist. It was difficult for me to watch. This is a great way to dumb everyone down, and to reduce the quality of our lives. Perhaps that's the point.
So why does the liberal press do it? To spread fear and loathing. To divide us. It's shocking to me how many people still read or listen to that crap. Some insist that NPR and PBS are better, but when you listen to those, they are saying the exact same things as CNN, with fancier language. Western mainstream media, and mainstream alternative media, is dead.