"An ice age is coming!" 1970s
"Global warming is going to cook and drown us!" 2000s
"Man made climate change is destroying our world!" 2010s
So many lies, so that no one knows the truth.
The only thing that stays the same is the govern-cement wants more taxes "to save the world".
To bad they aren't into saving the world. I would pay good money if they were actually cleaning up the world. But their actions show they are not interested at all in helping the planet.
In fact, you can see that those above the govern-cements, those mother WEFers are doing what they can to destroy it.
And the MSmockingbirdM goes along with it, repeating all the lies, and never, ever clearing up what they said.
With all the lies, no one knows what is coming.
With all the lies, people think they are the problem, the cause, and feel bad about themselves.
Many children are made to feel they are bad, and that the world is going to end... like tomorrow.
This is extremely destructive, both mentally and physically.
Humans are a part of this world, and as such, making them feel apart, and destructive to earth is very, very bad.
So, all these lies are creating a double whammy.
Hurting people, and also making them unaware of what is heading their way.
We are heading into a mini-ice-age.
A grand solar minimum.
Unlike the global warming climate change people who have been wrong on every prediction so far, the ice age people have been incredibly accurate, even winning bets on rain quantities a year in advance.
Did you know the number of 95° days has dropped greatly?
The big thing, that most people have been lied to about ice ages, is that it is not just a period of extreme cold, it is a time of increased heat, followed by cold, harsh winters and short, intense summers.
Further our idea that the world is a pile of dirt, upon which the oceans sits is incorrect. It appears that the oceans and the continental plates float. Thus, land that loses ice weighing it down rises. And this may also mean that more ice, sitting on the oceans makes the ocean rise.
(or maybe waters from the firmament drop down and raise the ocean levels... we don't know, we have been completely lied to about all things)
So, instead of global warming melting all the ice and causing the edges of our continents to flood, maybe many more icebergs will cause the edges of our continents to be submerged. Woe to all those "climate evangelists" who bough ocean front property thinking that it was all a lie, global warming isn't happening, its our lie..."
Well, unfortunately, the seas, compared to the continental edges, are going to rise. Humanity should start moving all of its big industry inland. Instead, without knowing the truth, humanity will spend great sums of money trying to keep the incoming ocean at bay.
The northern countries are going to be covered in ice.
Canada will become a sheet of ice... pretty much to the border of America.
The signs this is coming will be glacier ice falling (a particular kind of snow) and building up in certain areas.
The next sign will be month long ice storms. Yes, this will mean that people that get their power cut will be without power for an entire month. We just do not have the ability to repair electric lines in a snow storm.
So, if you live up there, get a wood burning stove and a supply of wood. You are allowed to use them in an emergency, and this will be an emergency.
The cold part of the ice age is upon us.
I remember a BBC documentary from when I was a child in the 1980's predicting an ice age.
They looked at ice cores, realised than an ice age happened every 100,000 years, and then correlated it with the wobble of the earth's axis. As the axis tilts away from the sun, it gets colder. We're already past the half-way point as the axis swings away from the sun. The only thing that's delayed the cold has been massive deforestation.
We are not good with cycles telling... telling when they start, because we haven't seen enough to record things. And, if i had to say, this ice-age started in 2012, but that was the heat spike before the cold fall.
Yes, we may have pushed off the ice-age by burning oil and deforesting.
... maybe.
We just do not have enough data to say firmly what is happening.
Correct. Eustatic, it is called, rise or lowering of land due to the mass of ice accumulating or declining, affects not only regions with fluctuating ice masses, but also regions in the general area, which may settle lower when other areas rise, or rise when other areas lower, as well.
Ice shelves that have always floated on the sea do not raise sea level when calving ice bergs. Ice bergs calving off an ice shelf have always been affecting sea level and do not create additional volume of ocean water when they separate from the ice shelf.
Ice that was supported by land and falls into the sea, such as where a glacier flows downstream to eventually reach sea level, does create isostatic, it is called, rise of sea level. In fact, increasing depth of water over the sea floor can cause the sea floor to lower, by increasing the mass of water pressing down on it, and this can cause nearby land to rise. There are some surprises that occur, because we do not well understand the distribution of pressure from isostatic and eustatic movement and how it can produce pressure elsewhere that causes eustasy and isostasy.
If you blow up a bunch of balloons and put them in a cardboard box until they begin to protrude up out of the box, and then try to put a lid on the box, pressing down on the lid will cause the sides of the box to bulge as the downward pressure of the lid is transferred from balloon to balloon, eventually to increase the pressure against the sides of the box. With a carton, we know the corners are stronger, so the bulging will all occur at the flat sides of the box.
The Earth, however, has no corners, and the materials in it aren't all the same density or fluidity. We do not well understand such differences below the surface of the Earth, making the interplay of eustasy and isostasy difficult to understand and predict.
However, the water cycle is temporally interrupted by water being locked up in ice, whether on land or on the sea. Frozen water doesn't cycle until it thaws. As water is removed from the cycle of evaporation and precipitation by being locked into ice shelves or glaciers, precipitation refilling the ocean does not equal evaporation emptying the ocean, and sea level is eventually lowered by a significant amount, more than 100 meters during the LGM (late glacial maximum), in an ice age.
The interaction of such isostasy and eustasy isn't always regular and predictable, so not all land currently at the shore was more than 100 meters above sea level during the LGM. There are places along the Canadian western shore that were shore then, in fact, due to eustatic rebound as the Cordilleran Glacier melted after the end of the last ice age equaling the isostatic rise in sea level in those locations.
One of the best publicly available resources for finding out more regarding how the end of the last ice age geologically affected Earth, and a discussion of isostasy and eustasy, can be found at Randall Carlson's site Kosmographia, in the dozens of videos he has published of discussions resulting from his field trips and others work. I have been amazed at the incredible megafloods that resulted from glacial meltwater pooling in enormous lakes as the climate warmed and then those lakes suddenly emptying, dozens of times over several thousand years, Randall and his guests reveal.
Thanks!
Edit:
Every kind of snow, that accumulates when it doesn't melt, becomes a glacier where it accumulates. Eventually the softest snow becomes so compressed by the weight of snow on top of it that it become rock hard ice.
Also, we may not know the shape of the world.
And what about that ice-wall.
Is it real? Is it all the way around?
If part of it melts... what?
And what if it is hold a sea back?
What if the firmament is a sea with more water?
And there is an exchange of waters.
You know, like God changing the water in a fish tank.
Every fish tank, no matter how good you clean it needs to have its water changed.
I do not know what the shape of the world is, and so will not rule out anything.
And damned if we do not pay attention to real archaeology. (have to believe we came down from the trees... 6000 years ago)
Nor do we pay attention to real cycles.
People have been studying the seismic shivers of the world for millennia. The understanding of the reflection, refraction, and rate of travel of those vibrations has become quite advanced lately. The generally spherical shape of the Earth is confirmed by seismic research, as well as much else.
You could find out what the shape of the world is fairly easily, if you discarded false hypotheses. That is the method I recommend.