To my mind, that kind of attitude would walk it's talk by stopping auto downvoting all of my posts - whether I talk about love, health or chocolate. Your actions are not aligned with your intent here.
To be honest, the fact that I still follow @curangel's downvote trail is an oversight. I set that up some time ago, when I could still generally endorse the downvoting choices being made. Truthfully, I thought I had already disabled it by now after a discussion months ago; I appreciate your bringing it to my attention.
While I certainly do desire to chip in my DV power to support anti-abuse efforts (thus my initially following that trail), I've long had some trouble aligning with others on what exactly constitutes "abuse" here. Personally I loosely define it as any dishonest and/or systematic behaviour carried out to extract value from the rewards system.
I'm not making a statement on whether you do that or not, because frankly I don't read you much, haven't really looked personally into your following, who you vote, or who votes you, and I literally just don't know enough to even begin to make an informed, unbiased assessment.
Regardless, for as long as "disagreement with rewards" is an acceptable criterion for a @curangel downvote, I won't be following the DV trail.
Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to taken action and explain. Ironically, one of the main (or only) arguments used to justify the downvoting is that my posts receive regular upvotes from 2 voting trails... the 'automation' of it is a problem for Azircon for some reason, but the automation of his downvoting trail is just fine apparently.