RE: REVERSE ENGINEERING ONLINE MEDIA PROPAGANDA

[n0m0refak3n3ws]

The importance of this exercise was to illustrate how easy it is to disseminate inflammatory and procedurally automated information texts for specific geopolitical (or other) goals. I meticulously went through the text, selecting key phrases or sentences which stuck out as "too headliney," then copy-pasted the same phrase into a search engine.
In 95% of searches done in this way, the first result was some mainstream media news article which contained the same key phrase in it's headline. And those articles were all published prior to February 4th 2020.
In another way, I've captured a chronological slice of mainstream media news headlines through this search and citation/ referencing process.

Hope this helps @valued-customer

Comments

[n0m0refak3n3ws]

I believe your post is elaborate propaganda, and intended to inflame racial, ethnic, and national hatred of the USA, particularly by Chinese people. As such it serves the transnational geopolitical objectives of the NWO, personified by the WEF, that seeks to infiltrate all the countries of the West with traitorous cabinet members and executives, which it has demonstrably done, in order to cause the collapse of the West, and particularly the USA, which certainly appears to be in progress.

LOL! Yes, exactly!

[n0m0refak3n3ws]

Just remember, it is not my post!

You can credit the dissected corpse left on the cutting room floor as mine if you like though. By creating a blockchained record of this original text and inserting the references it used for its own propaganda purposes, i've cut this shit up beyond any salvaging.

[valued-customer]

Well, not stating that was the purpose of the post in the post itself, or in the comment of links below it, left the false impression that the views expressed in the post weren't just AI generated, but were your opinion you intended to promulgate. I think that was a failure to provide information fundamental to your purpose, that you only now make clear as a reply to my comment.

I have said I appreciate the depth of research that went into the post, but failing to contextualize or update the research leads to gross misunderstanding, and I expect that to not be repeated. It would have been very easy to include one sentence at the end, or better yet, at the beginning of the post to point out the very different purpose of the post to most blogs, and failing to do that was very misleading.

I hope you do learn from that failure and do not repeat it.

Thanks for clearing up the misunderstanding.

[n0m0refak3n3ws]

My pleasure. I've edited the original post to add a preface that directly addresses our discussion.

Thanks