You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Are you supporting the top 20 witness who is publicly pushing for the exinction of the human race?

in Informationwar3 years ago (edited)

The old gray mare, she ain't what she used to be...

It is good to see you and it's been awhile indeed.

I once wrote, "Truth with a capital 'T' is meant to be worshipped by followers and has nothing to do with honest 'T'."

It's more like a religion now and depends on the old world internet echo chamber. Where if you question the 'Truth', much like a cult, you'd lose everything and be banished from the tribe. Friends, identity, even one's own livelihood; all on the line. And that's all coming from the group that once championed, "Question everything."

Now it's, "Question everything except us, or else."

And if you're not in the group/echo chamber, there's an army equipped with a script ready and willing to blast you out of the room.

Cults don't allow outsiders either. The similarities are beyond striking. They are identical.

Why aren't any of the "Truthers" here questioning what's being presented in that post? Don't need to be a rocket scientist 'with 15 years experience' to be able to figure out what's happening there. Are the big votes more important than the reputation?
Purely speculation.

I enjoy questioning everything, including that behavior. Questioning that behavior is by far one of the most taboo subjects on the platform right now it seems. No echo chambers here. No protection from the outside world. No protection from questions. Hence, the meltdowns.

"But it's called the Truth! How can it be a lie! You must be one of them Hive cabal lizard people!"

Eerily similar to how 'mainstream' and politics will call anything they don't like, "Racist." Same game is being played it seems. Is it the same people?
Purely speculation.

I've been studying that peculiar behavior for over five years now. It's one of my favorite conspiracy theories.

I'm starting to think it's all by design. Make it all as loopy as possible so if someone did come along and did have some juicy actual truth, they wouldn't have a platform, because if it is the truth, they wouldn't want to be associated with all that nonsense, due to the reputation. Plus only that group markets the idea this platform is censored. And even with demonstratable proof it's not censored, they'll insist it's censored, and continue pressing that on anyone who will listen, potentially chasing away anyone with some actual truth. An incredibly twisted form of actual censorship; self-inflicted.

Hmmm.....

Hey. If something happens to me. It wasn't suicide.