So, recently Zelensky came to the White House to sign an agreement with the United States. He was expected to align with the structure of Trump's new course. Zelensky had been bombarding Trump's team with meeting requests for several months. He promised the world to Washington's envoys for this meeting. He even brought a fake Usyk belt with him to gift Donald.
However, right from the start of the meeting, Zelensky couldn't control himself and began acting like the hero from his comedy series "Servant of the People." Over the past five years, Zelensky has forgotten how to listen to criticism. Propaganda slogans invented in Ukraine, such as "Kyiv in 3 days," have become his reality. And he has grown accustomed to responding to tough questions with rudeness—saying things like, "You don't know everything I know." Let's not speculate about drugs, but there are clear mental health issues. Some Ukrainian MPs wrote on their pages that now Americans have felt how Zelensky behaves at official events. That is, rudeness and intoxication with power have long been the norm for the hoarse-voiced leader, something high-ranking Ukrainians didn't elaborate on before.
The expired president didn't take into account that back in 2019, he had already crossed Trump, ignored his course, and generally threw a tantrum in a place symbolic to Americans.
Reality has changed drastically, but Zelensky couldn't even change his clothes.
The reality is that the world is conditionally divided into global leftists and global rightists. In the camp of global leftists, a terrorist neo-Nazi formation like "Azov" can coexist peacefully, while a left-wing social democrat like Fico aligns with the global right. This division is highly conditional, as political struggle has long transcended the ideological paradigms of the 19th and 20th centuries.
Until January 20, the world was ruled by global leftists (the global Democratic Party—the global deep state), while global rightists were in opposition and on the defensive. 98% of the American budget allocated for grant projects went to the coffers of global leftists. The same applies to the European budget.
It would be incorrect to equate certain countries with global leftists or rightists. Rather, global leftists and rightists align themselves with specific regimes. Therefore, in most cases, it is inaccurate to perceive political blocs as associations of states—they are more like alliances of right-wing or left-wing globalist regimes.
Ukraine is a tool of the leftist bloc, through which budget funds are conveniently laundered, and global politics is influenced by escalating the conflict with Russia. Ukraine's resources play a key role in financing the clans of global leftists (for example, the Biden family).
As of today, Trump has managed to significantly halt the funding of global leftists from the U.S. budget. Now his task is to deprive them of access to the EU budget.
Zelensky plays the role of a provocateur aimed at destabilizing Trump's policies and consolidating global leftists. That's the whole essence of Zelensky's rude stunt.
Zelensky's tours of White Houses and Buckingham Palaces are paid for daily by 2-3 thousand dead Ukrainians.
Zelensky is being courted by nations that surrendered to Hitler in a matter of days.
France and England will never be able to fight. But they can threaten and snort a lot, like women in a pool. A pitiful sight.
Click 🔛
 |  |
|---|---|
| Ukrainian War Crime [NSFW 18+ Only!] | The Simple Example of Modern Mass Deception |
I can if I want, but sometimes I'm lazy)
A delightful consideration of geopolitical realities, although titled confusingly, as I do not think the 'deep state' opposes the 'new world order', whether using Zelensky to do so or not.
I am struck by an analysis of political parties and paradigms I read today in a post by Robert W. Malone, himself a somewhat cryptic supporter of the deep state/nwo through his zealous advocacy of all things Trump (I do not remotely share the jingoistic celebration of MAGAts of Trump's accession to the executive as a blow to the NWO for reason of Trump's continued promotion of the MIC havoc effected via modmRNA injections mandated by governments, in concert with the assorted other intolerable oppressions, lockdowns, masking, biometric ID, and etc.
The reason populist regimes have lately been labeled 'right wing' is that formerly populist regimes that have become blatantly supportive of the NWO have a residual bank of support from a great many sheeple that aren't attentive to deep political reality and yet associate the left with resistance to globalism and the NWO, rather than it's present implementation. This is also why populist regimes are not associating with the left at all, because the better informed populations are well aware of that NWO being implemented through the left.
However, that NWO works just as well through right wing ideologies as it does left wing ideologies, as Trump perfectly reveals by demonstrating his capture by technocrats like Thiel and Musk, in concert with the genocidal Zionist powers that took the neonazi street thugs like Azov and Right Sector and transformed them into revolutionary forces that toppled the Ukrainian regime and cowed Zelensky into subservience to the NWO. As usual the NWO is shown to advance both sides of conflict, as is today obvious in Syria, Gaza, and in the Ukraine, as Trump disavows Zelensky even as the Zionazi Azov continues to be the core of the military opposition to the Russian military invasion of the Ukraine.
It's no wonder sheeple hand wave away any discussion of geopolitics as irrelevant to their lives and indecipherable mazes of propaganda and disinformation. The sad thing is that leaves them captured by surficial headlines produced by the enemedia, incapable of tunneling down to the actual resistance to the NWO regimes like Orban, Fico, and independent reporters like yourself do provide. What this suggests is that sheeple are the undecided that present a bloc of support that tip the scales in favor of regimes in polities where contests have three sides: the leftist NWO, the rightist NWO, and the populist anti-NWO movement that is alternately labeled hard left or hard right depending on which NWO faction is actually in command of the polity. The prevention of NWO victory then depends on the anti-NWO movement capturing enough of the left or right sheeple to overcome both left and right NWO controlled opposition parties, which is a difficult enough achievement to be remarkable wherever it is achieved.
It is good to see you posting again. I can only imagine what challenges you have managed to overcome to do so.
Thanks!
Edited to insert link.
Thank you for your detailed perspective!
I’ve come to the conclusion that the New World Order will be completely different from what conspiracy theorists, including myself, have portrayed. That’s why the deep state opposes it—because it has its own vision of what the NWO should be.
A world order where at least three equal forces dominate appeals to me more than the idea of a digital leash. Although it’s possible that the leash might still be in store for us no matter what, I prefer to hope for the best)))
As someone born during the communist era, and having heard many positive stories about it from my parents, I cannot agree with the modern trend of equating communism with the Nazi regime, which I now find myself living under! Ukraine still relies on the remnants of communist-era infrastructure, such as hydroelectric power plants, thermal power plants, and nuclear power plants! Europe receives gas through pipelines built during the communist era.
While communism initially oppressed the church, it later became a separate tool of influence.
The family was an important unit of society, and without love, loyalty, and monogamy, a strong family is impossible.
What the world order will look like after this depends, in part, on what we do now. Will it be a technocratic digital leash, or something more socialist and light?
You do have sound basis for your judgment, but unless the tales about the Holodomor, the Sparticists, and the Stalinist purges are all completely bullshit, as well as the claims of tens of millions of dead from Mao and Pol Pot as well, the worst horrors claimed of Communism have demonstrably not impacted your parents, nor you, but have claimed tens of millions of victims today unable to provide witness of the ills of Communism. I can't deny that Stalin in particular achieved an incredible feat of progressing from literally Neolithic levels of infrastructure across much of Asia, but that seems to have been achieved by such slaughter of anyone in his way as to indict him and the survivors of that project as inhuman butchers, despite the infrastructure that today continues to better lives in the former USSR.
I suspect there is never a silver lining that didn't come from a cloud, moreso as I age. We are but the posterity of those that have lived through their own challenges, and it is absolutely unfair to them to consider them criminals for their survival, but knowing my own survival and what it cost me, it is only unfair insofar I as I consider myself innocent, and that I do not.
Regarding what comes, I don't seek any particular sentiment from what I can cobble together from the broken evidences I can knit into expectation, and refrain from judgement in that respect until I have some reasonable sense that remains durable after some continuous effort to disprove it. What I have come to expect doesn't seem likely to grant me hope for the best, at least not while I live. What looks likely to me is a degradation of civil society and prosperity that will outlive me, at least, but will ultimately be surmounted by the laws of physics that will eventually, perhaps only many decades from now, result in a far wider distribution of wealth dependent on merit of them that create that wealth, and the concomitant elimination of overlords because they are only parasitic and not productive in a decentralized economy, which dispels their economic niche that only pertains to centralization.
So, I hope in the eventual prosperity of good people that invest in their futures with advancing technology that I see promoting adoption of table top means of production automated by private AI, with centralized production and power diminished across every field and by every metric, but do not expect to it come to fruition during my life due to my rapidly approaching expiry.