I've been watching the debate about your proposal carefully. Not the who did what arguments, because I wasn't there and didn't see that.
However, I am very interested to see if PR and Exchange work will be recognized and valued and if people are willing to assign a monetary value to that... and pay for it.
I would argue at this point that was the most meaningful effort impacting the price and visibility of Hive.
The developers could have made a quiet copy and no one would have cared and very frankly that is exactly what I expected.
I can't prove it, but I would say 90% of the value increase in both Steem and Hive have been directly related to PR and exchange listings. (say the name)
Good luck on your proposal, regardless of the who did what... when, it would provide evidence that things might really be different on Hive.
I'm just not that interested in relaunching my interest in watching development fiddle with internal development topics.
Oh, thank you. I didn’t really mean me here and most definitely will say that I hadn’t meant to cause such a debate or the crazy back and forth that had followed, but agree we need to find a way to compensate non devs contributions etc.
My comment above mostly was just trying to be open about the fact that many were given an opportunity to be involved and chose not to.
As I agree with this and that including more people with different skill sets etc can only add more value to Hive. Imo we have a diverse community here and if we can somehow find a way to encourage them to contribute, then everyone benefits.
I just wanted to simply say those who are currently being compensated from the DHF are those who stepped up to do the work, when others would not.
So totally agree with you we need to work on being more open, I guess I’ve also just accepted that sometimes it’s the same few involved as they are the ones stepping up. I personally hope that continues to improve.
Go away cunt.
Aw, you and those mean words.
:)