I read with great interest and the overall idea of a dynamic rate of minting of SPK based on network storage demand (if I understood this correctly) sounds good to me. A part that perhaps I'm missing is about a corresponding SPK sink - how does the supply diminish if there is less demand for storage?
I also tried to follow the examples of various scenarios but couldn't. So overall, a piece of feedback is that I'm pretty unsure of my understanding of how the network tokenomics are going to work.
Minting APR is only applied to Proven SPK (service providers).
To get storage from the network you have to Power SPK, which then gives your a resource credit to keep files stored on network. There isn't a reason to have a burnable sink unless:
Network usage goes down. When this happens it means people have let contracts expire(less storage) so our ability to probe the storage ecosystem has been diminished. At this time a transaction fee(on all liquid transactions and DEX trades) is applied with the fee being burned to reattain equilibrium. This fee does not effect anybody using the token for storage, and the feedback mechanism should work to keep the price of storage reasonable.
A progressive transaction fee kicks in on SPK tokens to punish those moving coins out to flexes and reward those remaining staked