I didn't write this post for arguing (racial bias, police violence on minorities, etc), but to distinguish between peaceful protesting versus rioting; especially when there has been a horrendous crime in this manner.
But if you are stating that I am not looking to police brutality as being considered into a factor of targeting people of color, then I would state back to you that police brutality isn't always about race... back in 2017 when a police officer (of Muslim descent) killed an American Australian woman Justine Damond. People there, also in Minnesota, organized a peaceful protest (with no rioting done during the investigation or trial of the officer).
In the above link to the article it is quoted as:
A few hundred people marched through Minneapolis on Thursday in honor of Damond, but the friends, neighbors and community members in attendance said the march also was about seeking justice for all people effected by police violence.
The event began where Damond, who had called police Saturday to report a possible sexual assault, was fatally shot by a Minneapolis police officer. According to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, officer Mohammad Noor shot from the passenger seat of his squad car, past his partner, killing Damond
Not only did Damond's friends and neighbors attend Thursday's rally, but members of Black Lives Matter Twin Cities and the Minneapolis NAACP participated as well
So these groups (BLM, friends and family of Damond) were there and protested police brutality in peace. There were no riots. The people who are out AFTER curfews are not there to solely protest the death of Floyd, they are there to be malicious, unruly and break laws.
See, you're not answering the question I put to you. In fact, what you've essentially done here is answer to a claim I didn't make. I can't defend a position I don't hold. Maybe read my comment again!?