Really in my opinion, they had to take drastic measures because of unscrupulous people.
We all had a couple of accounts and the game was going well.
But the greedy people fucked us all up.
I think the article failed to mention, the people who created more than 100 accounts, taking the liquidity out of the game. That should also being mentioned so the author would be fair and his readers could make their own decision if the game scam or not.. The token price is back at 0.06 Hive after all...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't know any of the details about those people with hundreds of accounts who were taking the liquidity. And I can't really talk about something I'm not informed about. Otherwise I would have no problem adding it. But in all honesty I think screwing over all the users because the game they built had flaws that could be exploited is way wrong. They should pay the price to fix the exploits that are only there because they built a flawed game to begin with.
As an initial measure I think it's the right thing to do. And little by little I imagine that they will be adjusting the prices. The game is in phase alpha and it is normal that there are failures and changes that we do not like.
I think that sometimes you have to put yourself on both sides. What would you have done in their position? What measures would you have taken?
Maybe, contributing ideas to the game would have been a better option.
@sashas all this idiot did is give the game more press. It's the blockchain. We can all see what's happening.