What is good governance?
In my opinion, good governance must be very well decentralized.
and participants in good governance must be anonymous.
And need to prove their knowledge of the subject which we are discussing before being able to
vote on the subject.
I think.
It is also necessary.
to have a different...
trusted reputation.
to be able to partake in governance. Good governance that is
I'm using to transcribe my voice while driving.
So this post is a stream of consciousness.
which I probably will not edit much.
I'm going to go to the ground.
Can you hear me now?
Can you hear me now?
Okay good, I'll start driving then.
I mean Germany at the moment heading to England.
talking about good governance.
re-join the motorway having
this is...
and duct under the barrier in the toilet.
Can you hear me?
So if we are not a non-arice whilst partaking in governance, discussions and
then we...
probably...
self-centering our speech
to ourselves or not for fear of
or retribution.
When we are using anonymity for members of a
to govern the group, then we have the problem which we can solve.
of what are called sock puppets or box. In other words, having
we can increase our influence on governance.
This is an issue which I have a strong conviction can be solved.
through you solve a wave of trust.
And...
What uh cool.
R. Cool.
So valued, decentralized identity.
decentralized identity systems can you hear me?
Okay now...
The method of...
deliberation.
and voting to achieve decentralized consensus.
So firstly remember that the ability
decentralized discussions and voting for consensus depends on
by proof of knowledge in the sub-
subject which we are deliberating.
if you're likely that the subject
will already have been decided upon, at least partly by proposals,
outside of the conscientious mechanism.
So initially discussions will take place in a
town hall type of meeting
either by audio or video or chat
or the combination of these.
And from these...
Town hall type of meetings.
Proposals will be made by Fort leaders.
as to.
as a group can do two forward
the cause of the great people.
3...
Great.
Not great. Group.
G R O U P
so for example, let's say in a non-anonymous
there are three proposals put forward by thought leaders.
and very sufficient interest.
In these proposals,
worthy of a consensus discussion and vote.
At this point, the members of the group will sign in to a consensus meeting and deliberation will begin.
an algorithm of the Consensus Mechanism,
sort the members into small groups of probably sick
between six and eight members in each deliberation.
Groot.
G-R-O-U-B
this gives everyone the opportunity to speak.
whereas in the large group
this is not possible due to time restraints.
And...
other factors.
Testing can you hear me?
♪♪
testing.
So in a small discussion review
person gets a time to state his opinion on the proposal that had to be
that has been made in the town of all.
Each person will have a limit of time in which to speak in the first round of discussion.
It may be when it's your turn to speak.
you will agree with one of the proposals that has already been made and state so.
It may also be
especially if you
and the first speaker has made a new proposal which may be a combination
and you may decide
that this is a good idea but could still be amended so you make another proposal based on the ways you think it would be better.
After the last person in the discussion group has spoken
there will be another round of discussion.
because at this point everyone in the group will have heard
and therefore may wish to change his
stitchment.
It is likely that the weight of your vote, of each member's vote,
on various criteria.
which may include
state or coinhole.
with a camp.
and likely...
of the members, individual members,
influenced much more than
testing.
testing.
20%!
reputation score could also have an effect to
vote wait.
There is more to discuss regarding the deliberation of the
the small group.
So next after probably
it will be time to vote.
to achieve consensus, let's say in groups of eight
we will need at least five of eight
proposal for a consensus to be achieved.
It may be...
upon the importance of the subject of the meeting.
That a larger consensus will be required.
And this would be determined before the meeting takes place.
So once all the
voted and reached a consensus or perhaps not reached a consensus, some of the
those groups which have reached Consensus
a temporary delegate and a second
secretary. Secretary.
I'm...
At this point, the discussions will move to a second level.
where new groups will be formed made up of the elected
it's delicate.
D-E-L-E-G-A-T-E-S.
So for example,
If the total number of members who have joined the meeting is 64 people,
And the groups are of eight people.
And every day.
was able to come to consensus.
Then the second level would be made up of eight
delhi gets.
get a good shit.
Therefore, at the second level, there would only be one small group of people.
the jump of each delegate
is to state the consensus reached
in the bottom level group.
After each delegate has stated the consensus of his
group.
Then there will be a round.
of discussion.
where each delegate can vote.
the consensus is he has heard.
Or make a new proposal.
and probably after one...
The delegates will vote.
in 600 meters.
Continue on it 76.
I'm using
so Transcribo is picking up when it speaks.
Assuming the delegates are able to be taken, they are not able to be taken.
the next action spec.
The discussion...
the first level group.
the remaining...
seven members in the first-level group.
So...
The delegate's meeting.
So we'll know the consensus that they have reached.
And we'll now take a vote as to whether or not they agree with the consensus.
If there is not a consensus,
group agreeing upon
delegates have reached.
then another round of discussion can take place and a new proposal made based on what has been
and voted upon.
And then we repeat in another delegate's discussion.
if need be, if there is not a consensus amongst the eight groups
and the process continues until a complete group consensus has been reached or has not been able to be reached in the time allocated for the time.
Meeting.
The consensus will probably include the consensus.
Can you hear me?
Action step.
take after the meeting.
Those members who voted for the proposal,
agreeing to the action stunt.
Those who voted against the consensus are not obligated to take
the action stunt.
But me, if they wish, take the steps anyway.
or they may...
choose to leave the group if they feel strongly that
the steps are dead.
to the cause of the great world.
In 600 meters, continuous straight onto E3-14.
Continue straight onto E-314.
Continue on E-314 for 86 kilometers.
testing.
Those who voted for the consensus will have their
enhanced as a result of being part of reaching that consent.
Who joined the meeting?
We'll also have their reputation score at the time.
Oh, who joined the meeting?
eeee
A L L.
testing.
Tuskegee.
after the meeting has finished
and members have taken the action
in the
end.
action stops have been
assessed.
Further town hall meetings will take place.
and there may well be new proposals.
be deliberated.
during a consensus meeting.
One thing to remember is that the user ID, the
identity.
and the reputation score attached to that ID.
or at the meter level.
Therefore, whichever group you are in,
your reputation for your
particular group will affect your
reputation score.
Note that the...
at the meter level.
is agnostic of the different calls group.
are able to use
the governance system.
examples of course groups which could use this matter
all.
education.
health.
Save the Wales.
Privacy projects like Zeno, Firo, and Firo.
that big car.
epic car.
Being...
Monero.
to name but a few
social media platforms like
even Twitter.
and fake.
Face the...
businesses.
Charities.
Parent Teacher Organisations.
even governments could use it.
Groups like freedom cells.
and...
G1
libra Karen C.
For now, as I am driving, I will not edit this.
just pushed it as it is the raw
data.
later I may well edit
and use AI to improve the
structure and format.
your input via the comment below
will be much appreciated.
Peace and love.
Art to my...
A T M I
The three did feed.
you
peace warriors.
What is good governance?
In my opinion, good governance must be very well decentralized.
and participants in good governance must be anonymous.
And need to prove their knowledge of the subject which we are discussing before being able to
vote on the subject.
I think.
It is also necessary.
to have a different...
trusted reputation.
to be able to partake in governance. Good governance that is
I'm using to transcribe my voice while driving.
So this post is a stream of consciousness.
which I probably will not edit much.
I'm going to go to the ground.
Can you hear me now?
Can you hear me now?
Okay good, I'll start driving then.
I mean Germany at the moment heading to England.
talking about good governance.
re-join the motorway having
this is...
and duct under the barrier in the toilet.
Can you hear me?
So if we are not a non-arice whilst partaking in governance, discussions and
then we...
probably...
self-centering our speech
to ourselves or not for fear of
or retribution.
When we are using anonymity for members of a
to govern the group, then we have the problem which we can solve.
of what are called sock puppets or box. In other words, having
we can increase our influence on governance.
This is an issue which I have a strong conviction can be solved.
through you solve a wave of trust.
And...
What uh cool.
R. Cool.
So valued, decentralized identity.
decentralized identity systems can you hear me?
Okay now...
The method of...
deliberation.
and voting to achieve decentralized consensus.
So firstly remember that the ability
decentralized discussions and voting for consensus depends on
by proof of knowledge in the sub-
subject which we are deliberating.
if you're likely that the subject
will already have been decided upon, at least partly by proposals,
outside of the conscientious mechanism.
So initially discussions will take place in a
town hall type of meeting
either by audio or video or chat
or the combination of these.
And from these...
Town hall type of meetings.
Proposals will be made by Fort leaders.
as to.
as a group can do two forward
the cause of the great people.
3...
Great.
Not great. Group.
G R O U P
so for example, let's say in a non-anonymous
there are three proposals put forward by thought leaders.
and very sufficient interest.
In these proposals,
worthy of a consensus discussion and vote.
At this point, the members of the group will sign in to a consensus meeting and deliberation will begin.
an algorithm of the Consensus Mechanism,
sort the members into small groups of probably sick
between six and eight members in each deliberation.
Groot.
G-R-O-U-B
this gives everyone the opportunity to speak.
whereas in the large group
this is not possible due to time restraints.
And...
other factors.
Testing can you hear me?
♪♪
testing.
So in a small discussion review
person gets a time to state his opinion on the proposal that had to be
that has been made in the town of all.
Each person will have a limit of time in which to speak in the first round of discussion.
It may be when it's your turn to speak.
you will agree with one of the proposals that has already been made and state so.
It may also be
especially if you
and the first speaker has made a new proposal which may be a combination
and you may decide
that this is a good idea but could still be amended so you make another proposal based on the ways you think it would be better.
After the last person in the discussion group has spoken
there will be another round of discussion.
because at this point everyone in the group will have heard
and therefore may wish to change his
stitchment.
It is likely that the weight of your vote, of each member's vote,
on various criteria.
which may include
state or coinhole.
with a camp.
and likely...
of the members, individual members,
influenced much more than
testing.
testing.
20%!
reputation score could also have an effect to
vote wait.
There is more to discuss regarding the deliberation of the
the small group.
So next after probably
it will be time to vote.
to achieve consensus, let's say in groups of eight
we will need at least five of eight
proposal for a consensus to be achieved.
It may be...
upon the importance of the subject of the meeting.
That a larger consensus will be required.
And this would be determined before the meeting takes place.
So once all the
voted and reached a consensus or perhaps not reached a consensus, some of the
those groups which have reached Consensus
a temporary delegate and a second
secretary. Secretary.
I'm...
At this point, the discussions will move to a second level.
where new groups will be formed made up of the elected
it's delicate.
D-E-L-E-G-A-T-E-S.
So for example,
If the total number of members who have joined the meeting is 64 people,
And the groups are of eight people.
And every day.
was able to come to consensus.
Then the second level would be made up of eight
delhi gets.
get a good shit.
Therefore, at the second level, there would only be one small group of people.
the jump of each delegate
is to state the consensus reached
in the bottom level group.
After each delegate has stated the consensus of his
group.
Then there will be a round.
of discussion.
where each delegate can vote.
the consensus is he has heard.
Or make a new proposal.
and probably after one...
The delegates will vote.
in 600 meters.
Continue on it 76.
I'm using
so Transcribo is picking up when it speaks.
Assuming the delegates are able to be taken, they are not able to be taken.
the next action spec.
The discussion...
the first level group.
the remaining...
seven members in the first-level group.
So...
The delegate's meeting.
So we'll know the consensus that they have reached.
And we'll now take a vote as to whether or not they agree with the consensus.
If there is not a consensus,
group agreeing upon
delegates have reached.
then another round of discussion can take place and a new proposal made based on what has been
and voted upon.
And then we repeat in another delegate's discussion.
if need be, if there is not a consensus amongst the eight groups
and the process continues until a complete group consensus has been reached or has not been able to be reached in the time allocated for the time.
Meeting.
The consensus will probably include the consensus.
Can you hear me?
Action step.
take after the meeting.
Those members who voted for the proposal,
agreeing to the action stunt.
Those who voted against the consensus are not obligated to take
the action stunt.
But me, if they wish, take the steps anyway.
or they may...
choose to leave the group if they feel strongly that
the steps are dead.
to the cause of the great world.
In 600 meters, continuous straight onto E3-14.
Continue straight onto E-314.
Continue on E-314 for 86 kilometers.
testing.
Those who voted for the consensus will have their
enhanced as a result of being part of reaching that consent.
Who joined the meeting?
We'll also have their reputation score at the time.
Oh, who joined the meeting?
eeee
A L L.
testing.
Tuskegee.
after the meeting has finished
and members have taken the action
in the
end.
action stops have been
assessed.
Further town hall meetings will take place.
and there may well be new proposals.
be deliberated.
during a consensus meeting.
One thing to remember is that the user ID, the
identity.
and the reputation score attached to that ID.
or at the meter level.
Therefore, whichever group you are in,
your reputation for your
particular group will affect your
reputation score.
Note that the...
at the meter level.
is agnostic of the different calls group.
are able to use
the governance system.
examples of course groups which could use this system
education.
health.
Save the Wales.
Privacy projects like Zano, Firo
epic cash
Beam
Monero.
to name but a few
social media platforms like Hive
even Twitter.
and fakebook
businesses.
Charities.
Parent Teacher Organisations.
even governments could use it.
Groups like freedom cells.
and...
G1
libre currency
For now, as I am driving, I will not edit this.
just pushed it as it is the raw
data.
later I may well edit
and use AI to improve the
structure and format.
your input via the comments below
will be much appreciated.
Peace and love
Atma
Personally, I think the best setup is a solutocracy...
Solutocracy – A Way to Govern (article): https://peakd.com/informationwar/@amaterasusolar/solutocracy-a-way-to-govern
Hmmm. i read this before.
"Let Us presume We have a society with no rulers. EveryOne is Self-sovereign and may do any Ethical thing They choose."
When we get there, for sure it sounds like it might have merits.
But we are not there now. What i am proposing i think could get us there.
When enough of Us stand sovereign We'll be there... Any controlmind gets no blanket consent from Me. I may agree to some things, but not others.
I do think We need the key - no money to account for Our energy added into a system by virtue of money in any form...
So I focus on encouraging All who can to work on that and share successes freely.
An interesting flow of conscience-ness. One point that we disagree on would be needing to prove an understanding of a subject to vote on it. If government were decentralized enough then each voter should be affected by the outcome of the vote and therefore has a right to participate in my opinion. How such a test could be made to be biased seems like another reason not to go that route.
Wishing you safe travels to the UK.
Thanks for your reply.
An initial knowledge test, (subject independent) would include a test to prive you understand the methodology of the consensus voting mechanism.
eg. That revealing your identity or that of another person would considerably negatively affect your reputation score.
Re a subject dependent vote:
Eg. A proposal to change the chain code from proof of stake to a combination of proof of work and proof of stake.
If potential voters do not understand what pow & pos mean, and the implications of the change, there vote will be meaningless. And bearing in mind there would be positive effects on Reputation for voting for a proposal which achieves consensus and likely token rewards both for joining a meeting and for voting for a proposal which achieves consensus, it is likely that some if not many would join the meeting even if they did not understand the terms & consequences. And, this would increase the number of attendees and the time taken for the meetings.
The idea is that for knowledge tests, written/video material would be offered to give the information needed to pass a multiple choice test.
Does that make sense & if so do you agree that knowledge tests might be necessary for some subjects?
Choosing a logo design (for example - if that were deemed necessary for an all members consensus vote) would not need a knowledge test, but i think i could come up with MANY more examples where it would be necessary.
It does have a logic to it. Will have to consider it more deeply to be able to answer your question though.
@atma.love, I paid out 0.092 HIVE and 0.025 HBD to reward 1 comments in this discussion thread.