< What do you think of making curation rewards "linear"? As in, a curator will get 50% of his vote's amount no matter who upvotes the post after him, or even if he upvotes last.'
I am not a fan of that as there is no incentive to vote quality content over trash.
I will agree the current system isn't perfect but I don't think that will fix the problem.
Yes, but I think that if people find trash valuable and want to upvote it, then we should let them.
The market makes the ultimate choice, allowing the freedom of choice is the job of the algorithm imo.