Then a person would not be able to give me a tip? Or even, no one would be able to give me a tip?
I understand that you are trying to offer a new facility to ListNerd holders and through that to support the value of ListNerds, but I think there are a couple of things to consider.
It takes energy and attention to deal with tip bot comments. It's like a poorly designed app where you have to make too many clicks to achieve your desired outcome. It's wearing for the user: if you imagine it's not once, but many times that they are having to mentally put tip bot comments to one side in order to see manual comments from responders.
I may refuse the bot - the comments and the tip (but doesn't that defeat your purpose)? But then I still have to wade through tip bot spam comments on other people's posts.
Then a person would not be able to give me a tip? Or even, no one would be able to give me a tip?
I understand that you are trying to offer a new facility to ListNerd holders and through that to support the value of ListNerds, but I think there are a couple of things to consider.
It takes energy and attention to deal with tip bot comments. It's like a poorly designed app where you have to make too many clicks to achieve your desired outcome. It's wearing for the user: if you imagine it's not once, but many times that they are having to mentally put tip bot comments to one side in order to see manual comments from responders.
I may refuse the bot - the comments and the tip (but doesn't that defeat your purpose)? But then I still have to wade through tip bot spam comments on other people's posts.
Not certainly in that way. appearance on a live example.
I will do the same. The final choice is always the one who owns the bot. I think this is logical.