It's at the bottom of his post:
There is nothing stolen, it is cited.
As written and explained by me in detail, I always cited my sources, never engaged in plagiarism or spam.
Acknowledge that!
It's at the bottom of his post:
There is nothing stolen, it is cited.
As written and explained by me in detail, I always cited my sources, never engaged in plagiarism or spam.
Acknowledge that!
Your source is not wrong. The point is - as showed in my last comment - that @sirdelly cited this source.
LOL. You don't.
I wrote here:
I never took writings without attribution. Thus, I never plagiarized.
You have exactly one job (that nobody gave you in the first place), and you fail miserably at that one.
!invest_vote
@bambuka denkt du hast ein Vote durch @investinthefutur verdient!
@bambuka thinks you have earned a vote of @investinthefutur !
I asked you to provide a screenshot from the source provided in the post showing that the writing is not plagiarised.
You are obviously aware that you curated fraud and then made a false accusation that there was a source that linked to the text in this post.
I did that here: https://peakd.com/@zuerich/re-hivewatcher-sb0xi9
Once again, here:
I clearly did not ask you to provide me a screenshot from the post showing a link at the bottom of the post.
Please provide a screenshot from THAT YOUTUBE VIDEO (which was given as a source at the bottom of the post) to prove that the same writing is there.
I think that there may be a language barrier because you seem to have obvious difficulty understanding English.
Would you like me to ask someone speaking German to translate my responses?
Clearly?
Perhaps you can't write in proper English or can't express what you really want to say.
In your first comment you link a "source of potential text plagiarism". This links to the exact same source as @sirdelly's original post.
Why should I search for potential other sources for his writing? This post adds value, and thus I upvote.
Source
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Lies_Bleeding_(2024_film)