The secret lies in how you differentiate between groups of people. I am more trusting of people from my hometown (rurban Canada - a small city in a rural area of Canada) no matter what their DNA, who they love, or what clothes they decide to wear compared to someone in a big city in the USA (as an example).
If you follow his "posts" and recognize or realize how little he knows about the people he constantly ridicules as immoral, racist and stupid, it's hard to consider him as anything else than the caricature which he paints his "opponents" as. He's white, yet his parents are black. He's from a Dutch Colonial Country and he's Dutch yet writes almost exclusively about America, and hasn't made anything but passing remarks about the Netherlands, without which, much like his ethnicity, (barred his few instances of blundering English) you'd never know he's completely unqualified to make and pass judgement on Americans. He's not a gauge for anything in effect, he's a chameleon, and as he despises white, he readily identifies, so as he despises Americans, he also identifies as American. Over here, much like in my native Romania, and so too Canada, it would be an egregious thing to claim you're from the country, instead of from the city, especially when all you know about the country is from second and third party accounts, though you could fake it for a while especially when you're exploiting others prejudice for country folk, exactly what he's doing when he pretends that he has any understanding or knowledge of "Jordan Peterson, Steven Crowder, Ben Shapiro and other public figures on the political and ideological right-wing".
His biggest criticism is based on the prejudices of a Black, Identifies as White, Dutchman, much like a city folk, critical of country folk, considering them hillbillies and racist.