Oh. I get that. But a "technocracy" can be looked at as control by bankers (globalists) and one-world government for the purpose of enriching a few. It can also be looked as a meritocracy whose goal is to improve the live of all and "save the planet".
It could also be looked at through different "lenses".
Is the technocracy a nefarious cabal of bankers and unelected elites trying to rule the world and manipulating everyone? Is the technocracy a meritocracy? Or is it the "feeling" that we should have scientists and bankers and other experts do more than simply advise elected representatives? That they themselves make the decisions on the economy, etc...
If it's the later then how is this different than Marxism? The Marxist argument, after all, is that experts would establish a proper framework and the society would grow and prosper from there.
ok......lets say...'technocracy is the furthest expression of an oligarchical structure that's gone woefully extreme..(due to the tech).
you might enjoy my next couple of posts...