If you truly believe that Husley / Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks study is seriously flawed it pales in comparison to the official version of the WTC building 7 collapse produced by the NIST which is patently nonsensical and glaringly incomplete.
"absolute rubbish"
What the NIST did was to produce a “collapse initiation sequence”. They failed to explain the actual dynamics of the collapse. So what they provided ultimately was a sequence that led up to what they proposed was an inevitable collapse of each building.
The data used to create the official NIST WTC7 collapse model is, surprise, surprise - "classified".
Concerning the 'thermite theory', it can neither be proven nor disproven because of the wholesale destruction of evidence from ground zero. The rubble from the twin towers were hurriedly shipped out of the country and sent to scrap yards in China and India before any significant, rigorous and scientific investigation could be conducted. The crime scene quickly covered up.
http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/wtc/groundzero/china_baosteel.htm
You probably believe in your own unicorns regarding 9/11 such as when the indestructible passport of one of the hijackers, Satam al Suqami, was discovered, completely intact by a 'passerby' a few blocks from the World Trade Center. The black boxes were never retrieved.
https://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/911_TerrTrav_Ch2.pdf
I tried to explain in a few words why the Hulsey report is rubbish. You dont really explain anything about NIST.
No, what you just shown is the dynamic analysis of the situation based on information present from eye witness accounts and video footage, rubble analysis.
Something the Hulsey report does not have. Its not just enough to show the animation, you have to explain it "on paper".
The hulsey report can be easily thrown in the trash because its very poorly done and it took about 20 mins to figure out its flaws. The NIST report is much more complex and comprehensive. Done by one of the best institutes in the world and by hundreds of scientists, engineers.
If you want to assume that they were all payed off, fine. Believe what you want.
I really wont go through hundreds of pages of the NIST report because the core claims seem very plausible to me, but even if you dont agree with the NIST report, maybe you think its flawed why would that prove a conspiracy of any kind?
Why would you think that? Isnt the right conclusion: "They just got it wrong."
This is the ridiculous way of thinking you guys subscribe to i mentioned before.
Its very important for you to learn "how to think".
If something cannot be proven or disproven then how is it worth talking about?
Then its just a worthless claim.
Maybe it was aliens. You cant prove or disprove that. Maybe god did it. Cant prove or disprove that.
Actually you can disprove all the claims about thermite easily but maybe it was some kind of high tech undetectable never seen before thermite (see what i mean).
Both the microsphere thing and the claims about chemical compounds found there.
Funny how conspiracy theorists make so many claims about the substance of the rubble and the chemicals present but also claim that you couldnt test anything because they shipped it all to China. Which one is it?😄.
Actually there were tests done even this or last year by a independent agency looking for the thermite. They explained away the red chips or whatever it was, cant remember exactly. So theres still plenty of evidence available.