How exactly was Milei's endorsement phrased? Is there any indication he participated equitably? It is very troubling that in the fast and popularity based valuation of memecoins, Milei would either endorse such a project and then quickly withdraw that endorsement without having an understanding of what those actions would mean to the project, the valuation of the token, or the impact it would have on the market and people that valued his recommendation. The example of President Trump's issuance of such a token cannot have been unknown to Milei prior to his actions, and this implies not only that he was fully apprised of the volatility he would cause by taking those actions, and that he undertook them, then, intending to cause the initial soaring valuation and it's subsequent crash in value. That, in turn, suggests there was a profit motive for his actions.
The implications of these conclusions strongly impugn Milei's character, and I hope evidence - beyond mere assertions - is uncovered that such financial benefits were neither sought nor attained by Milei, or any family, friends, or associates.
Thanks!