While I cannot comment cogently on the claims Bolsonaro was cognizant of, or even participated in, a plot to assassinate Lula, I can note that while President, Bolsonaro did draw immense crowds during the campaign, and despite the agitation of those crowds did not wield that power offensively to commit any violence against his political opponents. Given the apparent corruption the judicial system that sprung Lula and the international financial and sotto voce support behind those moves, I remember being astounded he did not wield that power against that apparent corruption. Such restraint as President makes bold and violent plots stand distant from, and uncharacteristic of, Bolsonaro.
Do you recall the specifics that the judiciary, clearly the hand of Moraes, used to spring Lula? The divergence between the policies of the Bolsonaro administration and the climate alarmism, almost rabid mandates for diversity hires, and collectivist policies being pushed by BlackRock, whose CEO was also the Agenda Director of the WEF, Larry Fink, were imposed on transnational corporations (today disavowing and departing from those policies widely), in the USA by the Biden administration, heavily funded by Soros' NGOs, and seemed to be coming almost verbatim from Lula upon his being sprung from the joint, and strongly suggest international covert pressure on Moraes to get Lula into the Presidency, also suggested by the very wide divergence between popular support at rallies for the candidates, and the claimed Lula electoral victory.
Following the identical dynamic in the US 2020 election, and claims by Klaus Schwab of infiltrating his trained YGL cadres into cabinets of Western governments, that election seemed very dubious to me, and the present accusations of behaviours very uncharacteristic of Bolsonaro but exacerbate that suspicion, mirroring as they do similar lawfare that failed to prevent Trump's election in 2024.
Thanks!