Much of the claim that the mRNA coding for the spike protein is nonfunctional, of coding for other things, and the CAS9 CRISPR enzyme presence, in Cominarty jabs is worded clumsily, and unsupported. While I can provide no evidence to counter those claims, they are extraordinary claims that require extraordinary evidence to support them, and no evidence is availed.
There are none of the discussions of methods that are essential for reproducibility, and the lack of any photographs, data tables, or apparent thought as to just how the claims were possible to find, leads me to be unable to have credence in those claims. While they read like an outline for a science fiction tale, the variability of the jab lots is hard to otherwise interpret than as experiment, and there may well be plentiful evidence to support hypotheses along the suggested lines that should be investigated.
There's certainly plentiful ancillary evidence of well heeled parties making public statements for generations that would support such crimes, and evidence of criminal attacks on people using vaccines tainted to neuter recipients, over a million women in Kenya, for example, as well as the fact that the jabs have killed more people than all vaccines combined since VAERS surveillance began, so I would very much support and like to see research that specified and detailed the biologically active contents of the jabs conducted.
Nothing I've seen shows that it has been.
Thanks!