Most politicians are accomplices to murder, or at a minimum to manslaughter (if they are too stupid to know their actions are killing lots of people).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Most politicians are accomplices to murder, or at a minimum to manslaughter (if they are too stupid to know their actions are killing lots of people).
Is the politician or commander-in-chief complicit in the murder, who orders to defend ourselves?
Perhaps i shouldnt have opened this subject,but, my understanding is that all wars are deliberately instigated for profit, by the powers that shouldn't be (big banking families etc) & the politicians and armies etc. (Knowingly or not) are their puppets.
I agree with your general statement, but my point was about more specific things
Understood.
Self-defence with sufficient violence to prevent harm is sometimes necessary, but unless i am in the shoes of the politician or commander-in-chief and know more about the particular situation and what has led up to it etc, i cannot answer.
This is fair.
There are many ways to defend yourself... you can use all available resources for defence, or you can plunder 90% and compensate for the shortfall with human lives.... When he steals or knows and does nothing -- yes, he is complicit.