You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Snaps Container // 1733732640

in Snapslast month

Hive Power is called power for a reason.

Active Hiveans who delegate most of it out don't really act wise. However, delegating a small portion to trustable projects is a good gesture.

Inactive users still can make money by delegating it though.

Sort:  

Hive Power is something magnificent, in many ways we can earn something and help people. Even the inactive can help in some way or keep their earnings with delegated HP.

Yes, that's the point :)

@caspermoeller89 likes your content! so I just sent 1 BBH(2/20)@godfish! to your account on behalf of @caspermoeller89.

(html comment removed: )

Yeah... a bit unsure how I feel about inactive users making a fortune by having delegated, auto-vote etc.
The feature is great, but there should be some limit to how long a user could be absent before it gets invalid.

!BBH

And how would you tell an account is inactive?

Btw why are you blacklisted?

I've noticed some UI's have a "last active". Not sure if it could be used, as I don't think it's on-chain. But something similar to it.

HW don't like AI use no matter how much or little it's used.
They've flagged my book series. And yes, AI is used to an extent in those, but only to enhance and make it more readable/a better read.
Some of them are even heavily edited edited after the enhancement because I didn't like the style and phrasing used. That also got flagged.

So, new strategy for me is to either burn or decline rewards on the book chapters if there is any AI enhancement at all (though I was certain the enhancement is allowed, otherwise I wouldn't have done it)

This "last active" is the last interaction with blockchain. You cannot tell if it was automated, or manual.

Regarding HW, I assume you appealed and were tasked with publishing posts that reject reward. Beware of publishing too "low effort posts", though, they might not count into your appeal. Like a single shot posts of blury mobile snapshot with little text and so.

If the "abuse" were the 1000 words book chapters with multiple images, they might expect to keep the bar. I've seen that a few times.

@caspermoeller89 likes your content! so I just sent 1 BBH(2/20)@godfish! to your account on behalf of @caspermoeller89.

(html comment removed: )

I greatly appreciate your feedback and advice! 🙏🏼🙏🏼
!BBH !DUO


You just got DUO from @caspermoeller89.
They have 1/1 DUO calls left.
duo_logo
Learn all about DUO here.

Perhaps some form of "activity-via" on chain. If it is an automatic vote, doesn't count as activity. Haven't thought too much about it, just throwing ideas up 😄

I did appeal, and I'm also aware the low quality posts doesn't do much in terms of that.
At the moment, I'm just setting all posts to burn or decline (including my snaps). This I will do for the book chapters to come, which will be similar to the other chapters.
Not too sure if they'll like it if I do the book the same way I have done it so far though 🤔

I believe they will be fine as long as the rewards are rejected.

Yeah, but I'd also like to be removed from that list thing 😄