Success! @acgalarza(2/1) You mined .9 HBIT and the user you replied to received .1 HBIT on your behalf. You can receive 100% of the HBIT by replying to one of your own posts or comments. When you mine HBIT, you're also playing the Wusang: Isle of Blaq game. 🏴☠️
Congratulations @acgalarza! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
You distributed more than 95000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 96000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the wordSTOP
HI @onlyjob! In the video you shared, he is speaking about a different topic. My post is about MEDIATION not MEDITATION.
But going back to my video, Considering that workplace conflict is inevitable, what are some specific situations you've encountered where you've seen conflict negatively impact a team's morale or productivity?
I watched the entire video and frankly I did not like it at all. It lacks useful advice. Speakers assume that "conflict won't go away", not even allowing possibility that adults in the workplace could reconcile their differences without involvement of leadership/mediation. That kind of managerial-ism and "safe space" nonsense is exactly what people dislike about leadership.
But worst of all, they don't recognise productive value of disagreements. If subject of disagreement matters, then it is important to argue about it to establish what's right. Reconciling between opinions that 2+2=4 and 2+2=5 is actually harmful because only one statement is true and it might be necessary to acknowledge what is right and what is wrong, especially in the workplace where performance or even success of the project might depend on understanding of such issues. Remember that perfect agreement means that either sides have nothing to contribute to the debate, or that they can't freely express their thoughts (probably due to fear of managerial "mediation"). Concealed ("mediated") disagreements might actually be worse than productive conclusion of a passionate debate.
Thank you, @melinda010100!
!HBIT
Success! @acgalarza(2/1) You mined .9 HBIT and the user you replied to received .1 HBIT on your behalf. You can receive 100% of the HBIT by replying to one of your own posts or comments. When you mine HBIT, you're also playing the Wusang: Isle of Blaq game. 🏴☠️
Sorry, but you didn't find a bonus treasure token today. Try again tomorrow...they're out there! You can see your random number generated in the Discord server, #hbit-wusang-log channel. | tools | wallet | discord | community | daily <><
There is a treasure chest of bitcoin sats hidden in Wusang: Isle of Blaq. Happy treasure hunting! 😃
Check for bonus treasure tokens by entering your username at a block explorer explorer A, explorer B, or take a look at your wallet. Read about Hivebits (HBIT) or read the story of Wusang: Isle of Blaq.
My pleasure
!INDEED
Congratulations @acgalarza! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 96000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPRelated:
"Ray Dalio explains meditation in 2 minutes".HI @onlyjob! In the video you shared, he is speaking about a different topic. My post is about MEDIATION not MEDITATION.
But going back to my video, Considering that workplace conflict is inevitable, what are some specific situations you've encountered where you've seen conflict negatively impact a team's morale or productivity?
Thanks for commenting!
!PIZZA
My mistake, sorry, I misread the title... :(
No worries! 🙂 You are welcome to watch my whole video. 😊 Then let me know what you think!
I watched the entire video and frankly I did not like it at all. It lacks useful advice. Speakers assume that "conflict won't go away", not even allowing possibility that adults in the workplace could reconcile their differences without involvement of leadership/mediation. That kind of managerial-ism and "safe space" nonsense is exactly what people dislike about leadership.
But worst of all, they don't recognise productive value of disagreements. If subject of disagreement matters, then it is important to argue about it to establish what's right. Reconciling between opinions that
2+2=4and2+2=5is actually harmful because only one statement is true and it might be necessary to acknowledge what is right and what is wrong, especially in the workplace where performance or even success of the project might depend on understanding of such issues. Remember that perfect agreement means that either sides have nothing to contribute to the debate, or that they can't freely express their thoughts (probably due to fear of managerial "mediation"). Concealed ("mediated") disagreements might actually be worse than productive conclusion of a passionate debate.Thanks for your opinion! 😁👍