Maybe the statement that says that "!LOLZ command not successful is LOLZ token burned" was the most confusing part. π€π
!LOLZ !HUG
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Maybe the statement that says that "!LOLZ command not successful is LOLZ token burned" was the most confusing part. π€π
!LOLZ !HUG
Exactly, that's the phrase that did it! π π π β¨ π€
!LOLZ
!HUG
I think that we should consider a token burned only if it is sent to the @null account. π€π€
!LUV
Yep, exactly! That's the definition that I use. π π π β¨ π€
!LUV
Looks like basically all of the confusion on my older comment is when I said "burning tokens" where the tokens are not sent to null. π€π
!PIZZA !LUV
Your assessment is correct! You got it! π π π β¨ π€
LUV
PIZZA
Do you mean "your" instead of
you're? π€ππ€Anyway, maybe the LOLZ burner bot needs a change of name because of the definition of token burning! π
!LUV
!PIZZA
Hehe...yes, that was a typo. It's been corrected.
That might be helpful, though a new bot would have to be created, since names can't be changed. πππβ¨π€
!LUV
!PIZZA
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @tydynrain.
(2/3)
I sent 1.0 HUG on behalf of @savvytester.
(2/3)