𝐼𝑛 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡 𝐿𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑏𝑦 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚. 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑒𝑘𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑛 𝑠𝑖𝑥 𝑘𝑒𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠: 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦, 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦, 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦, 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑦. 𝑇𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑜, 𝑖𝑡 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑤𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖, 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑒𝑟𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠.

^{BREAKING CYCLES}

𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒

𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑦. 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑, 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑, 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑠. 𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑦 𝑝𝑢𝑡, ‘𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖-𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑡’.

𝐼𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡, 𝑏𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑙𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦. 𝐼𝑛 ‘𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝐷𝑜𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚’, 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐺𝑖𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑖 𝐺𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒: ‘𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚; 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙. 𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙’. 𝐹𝑢𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑛, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑤𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒: ‘𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡, 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 ℎ𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠, 𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒.’

𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦, 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟, 𝑖𝑛 ‘𝑀𝑦 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑔𝑙𝑒’, 𝑠𝑎𝑦𝑠: ‘𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑑. 𝐼𝑡𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝ℎ𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑤’. 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑏𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒.

𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦

𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒, 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑟𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒. 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝐿𝑢𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑔 𝑣𝑜𝑛 𝑀𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑠, ‘𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑠’. 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠, ℎ𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟, 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦 𝑚𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠: 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒, 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦. 𝑀𝑎𝑗𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠.

𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚, 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑑, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑎 ‘𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦’, 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑎 𝑜𝑛𝑒-𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠, 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒. 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑐ℎ 𝑖𝑛 𝟷𝟿𝟹𝟹: ‘𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒. 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑚-𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚, 𝑎𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑒𝑡 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝐶𝑢𝑏𝑎, 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒.

𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦

𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠, 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑛 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙. 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝐹𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝐻𝑎𝑦𝑒𝑘, 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒, 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑠. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒, 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑.

𝐼𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡, 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚, 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑏𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦. 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐺𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒: ‘𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑦, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒.’ 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟, 𝑓𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡, 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 ‘𝑀𝑦 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑔𝑙𝑒’: ‘𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑛𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡’. 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛: 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠, 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑛, 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠.

𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦

𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠, 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚. 𝑊ℎ𝑜𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛'𝑠 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠 ℎ𝑖𝑚 𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒.

𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚, 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑑, 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑦 𝑚𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑, 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦, 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒. 𝐼𝑛 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝟸𝟻-𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑚𝑒, 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖, 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑛 𝑆𝑒𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑐𝑟𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑚𝑒, 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎 ‘ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑦 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑡ℎ’.

𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑦

𝐹𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑦 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 𝑏𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑, 𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑤ℎ𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑠.

𝐼𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡, 𝑏𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑑, 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠. 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑑: ‘𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑠 𝑏𝑖𝑔𝑔𝑒𝑟; 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚’. 𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟, 𝑖𝑛 𝑀𝑦 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑔𝑔𝑙𝑒, 𝑤𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒: ‘𝐼𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑡𝑜 ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦. 𝑀𝑎𝑛 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑖𝑚𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑓, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦’.

𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑦

𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠, 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑦 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦 𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑠. 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑠𝑡 𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒.

𝐼𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑡, 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑦 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙. 𝑀𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑖 𝑤𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒: ‘𝐹𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒’. *𝐻𝑖𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑟, 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝟷𝟿𝟸𝟿 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑐ℎ, 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑: ‘𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑒𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑙𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑎 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑖𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒’.

𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑦

𝐴𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑥 𝑘𝑒𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠, 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚. 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. 𝐴𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑙𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡, ‘𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑦𝑜𝑢 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑡, 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑦𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑟, 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑠𝑒, 𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟’.

CREDITS:

Fuentes digitales de extracción de las citas:
- Quotes from Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile
  - "The Doctrine of Fascism" (written by Mussolini with the collaboration of Giovanni Gentile):
    - English version: The Doctrine of Fascism

Quotes from Adolf Hitler

* My Struggle’ (Mein Kampf):
   * [German version: Mein Kampf (Project Gutenberg)](https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/34076)
   * [English version: Mein Kampf (PDF)](https://archive.org/details/meinkampf00hitl)

Quotations from Ludwig von Mises
- Socialism:
  - Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis
Quotes from Friedrich Hayek
- The Road to Serfdom’ (or “The Road to Serfdom”):
  - The Road to Serfdom (PDF)
25-Point Programme of the Nazi Party
- Programme of the National Socialist German Workers' Party:
  - Nazi Party Platform
  - English version: 25-Point Programme (translation)
San Sepolcro Programme
- San Sepolcro Program (Italian Fascism):
  - San Sepolcro Programme
CoolText