We don't need bots 'generating' (i.e. recycling) content. If people want to use 'AI' to summarise a post then they can use one, but the summary doesn't need to be posted. I am trying to avoid upvoting articles or images that have been generated unless there is actually some human creativity in the post.
The internet does give a skewed view of things as it is a tiny minority of people who actually post. When people say the 'internet blew up' over an issue it was probably a few dozen people posting and others just hit the like button.
Steev, that is a bit naive :)
This comment bot making 16 comments/min and made 330K comments is by Leo team :)
https://peakd.com/@ai-summaries/comments
there are others by leo people too!
taskmaster, a Leo crony, alone is 15% of the entire hive traffic!
Who do you think he is? Superman?
This is a public blockchain and all actions are public. Right?
We don't need to be a software guy to check this :)
I hadn't looked into that bot, but it seems fairly crap.
Yes, you sussed me :) I get to use my votes as I see fit. They still need more support to get funded and I will review the situation. I don't tend to use InLeo and so don't see all that happens there.