It's all a broken system anyway, but we at least hope it is fair and reasonable.
We can hope, but I don't think it is. I feel we shouldn't be voting for people or government at all, but rather for ideas and programs. The government should just be "the government" with roles picked based on suitability, like in a company. Those roles change depending on the programs supported. Blockchain and weighted voting would be super useful for this.
That is an interesting idea. I think it would be too far removed from where we are for most people to be able to handle it though.
Yeah, it is too out there for most I would assume, but it could be done in stages, where some parts are decided this way.
I'd be willing to see it attempted.