You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DECKS: Biggest PeakMonsters update yet?

in PeakMonsters2 years ago

OK have been making lots of relevant DECKS, to support a mix of personal and perceived community needs, some feedback, in no particular order of interest.

1 when selecting cards to make a deck, when one hovers over a card, a bigger version of the card appears over top, this bigger cards HIT BOX prevents the ability to hover over the card next to it when the selections area is very populated, making it difficult to change single card options or even remove a card, , , (needs a fix)

2 when selecting many cards to be part of a deck, once the population of a row is complete, it pushes everything down and ones mouse is no longer able to select cards without scrolling down and realigning, with the row of selectable cards, this can cause one to accidentally begin pressing options and other buttons on the screen around that level of the screen and all of a sudden, lots of crazy happnin,,,,(needs a fix)

both 1 and 2 eye would call EASE OF NAVIGATION FIXES

3 already spoken about by the main dev, a single button to attempt to rent the entire DECK in question, , , (exited for this)

4 in the all DECKS section, the ability to click on the NAMES section, so it organizes in relevant numeric alphabetical order, the current default organization feels a bit chaotic and seemingly engineered to favour the DECKS made specifically by PEAKMONSTERS (???)

5 the ability for the community to chose what they feel is PRO through consensus,and not just the dev having the ability to program PRO next to all their DECKS because they essentially own the site and CAN do that for themselves. Having the inability to filter by NAME in alphanumeric order keeping all of the devs DECK choices at the top coupled with them all saying PRO next to them, filters all of the noob attention on just favouriting and choosing those selections without the rest of the selections having a natural sense of equality, so feeling the need for a more platonic representation of the communities efforts and the option for the community to selects what they feel are hi quality arrangements, themselves. Maybe a ratings meter, or some other INCLUSIVE way to generate respect and attention for certain DECK arrangements, and their creators that may fall into obscurity, who have created equally good DECKS or arrangements that are similar to ones previously made, but didn't know that at the time of making one....

all comes from love and constructive sense of observation and growth, towards a better platform

Rarely these days can we do anything original, yet our unoriginal efforts still have the value of the efforts provided, and that effort has value and needs to be accounted for and recognized.....

It is quite easy in this life to take advantage and benefit from the lack of knowledge and intelligence of the majority, most do this. However, it is our responsibility to help develop and cultivate knowledge and intelligence within our developing culture, lest we prove to ourselves and each other that we are no better than a hungry exploitative corporation, in a higher dimension (blockchain).....

We are only truly as effective as our communities are knowledgeable, wise and aware.....

blessings and be well

Sort:  

6 Also seems we are cut of from making more decks after making 20, def more combinations then 20 DECKS worth of cards to make DECKS from.......( increasing this to 100 as a minimum would be super great )

Potentially, activate a higher number of DECKS that can be created by an account by say having some PKM token staked / locked in, for every certain ammnt of PKM u get say 10 or 20 more available DECKS to be created. This would also be a sorting measure to say who is taking their deck creating more seriously then say others who r totally fine with 20 or less.......

Hey thanks for all the feedback! Glad to see that you've been trying out decks extensively 😉

For 1) and 2), forwarding this to the peakmonsters discord

4 in the all DECKS section, the ability to click on the NAMES section, so it organizes in relevant numeric alphabetical order, the current default organization feels a bit chaotic and seemingly engineered to favour the DECKS made specifically by PEAKMONSTERS (???)

As for this, it is sorted by number of users who marked it as favorites. It just happened that at the moment, most of the decks with the most favorites count is made by the peak-monsters account. To further clarify which might probably address your point #5, there is no incentive for the PeakMonsters team to put the decks that we made at the top of the list. We are continuously adding and inviting more players to be "DECK PRO".

Do you have any specific column sorting feature that you wish to be added that you think would be a great QoL addition for everyone? :)

thank u so much for ur response , love working together to grow things like this, also for the clarification u provided on some points. If as in column search ur referring to clicking on a word atop a list to sort ( like say when organizing card collection and can click on too and the sorting changes ) then yes, for sure, the names one in general, just basic name of the decks and also a sort by account that made them, so one could click there and see a tidy list of stacks of the same creator and all they have made public , to get a nice gist of the arrangements they offer, would.love that.

and if league would say show if a thematic deck was say all bronze level, then the league would reflect that, or that u could select the intended league from the selection options when making a thematic and then that would make clicking league at top.of column sort everything relevent league order, that's it for sorting, cus price is always changing live, so column sorting that can be a bit misleading.

also added a idea to the peakmonsters feature base, to potentially increase the total ammount of deck a creator can create , by say staking some PKM or some kind of tokenized power up or offering , to increase the max ammount....

ya that's me, ttnx for replying

and claryfying peaks position in some of my queries

bless be well

  1. We'd like to improve that UX but having a hard time figuring out what to replace it with.
  2. Same as above
  3. Coming soon
  4. Column sorting wasn't top priority but is on the list of things we'd like to get time to do.
  5. Top players are proven in the standing, top content creators are proven because the market place of attention has proven their worth and then we will be able to look at the stats of what decks are valuable for the other. Perhaps when things get big we'll do some sort of vote to choose some others but it's not big enough to worry about.
  6. You can already get more than 20 ... just need premium to do more than 20... then you'll get 200... we're also gonna take some time and re-evaluate the numbers which means decide if it should stay or go up (pretty sure it wouldn't go down)... perhaps premium users need even more. But also we will likely not choose a number for non-premium that doesn't incentivize many people to get premium.