Very good, accusing without any kind of foundation is worse than what you say I do, my works have a long creation process and after the final product I always have a manual sketch that I always digitize to trace.
In my previous publications I showed the creation process in videos and even included the manual sketch, we invite you to take a walk through each one of them. And do not make these kinds of comments without foundation anyway, thank you for commenting, greetings.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Those observations were the foundation. I had a quick view on your profile and saw the previous posts didn't match the skills compared to this drawing and the other digital drawings also show the same process. I think you as an artist and looking at other posts like this you would also think this process is weird considering there was no step-by-step, only parts being "done" I'm sure you know what I mean.
Being vigilant is not worse than pretending and milking for rewards though, so I disagree.
This is where I was wrong, my mistake. I thought you generated an image and then just removed the other details for a WIP then published the unedited generated image.
But now I see you just painted over an existing image (which I still believe is AI generated) based on this screenshot of yours from this post
vs the final image which has some details changed
Now, some artists might have different opinions about using AI or whatever but I personally believe it is okay to draw over it to practice (since that's where we all start) but as long as you're not being misleading about the process and being fully transparent on it especially that we on Hive are earning from it. Saying that this is an original composition vs. copying (specifically tracing) from another image is a completely different thing.
So yeah I suggest next time just be transparent on stuff and there's no point misleading people because we can tell.