You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DAO Proposal: Swap DAO BUSD and USDC/T For DEC

in Splinterlandslast year

Why would we not want to compete the dao should do every thing to create increeased nav for unit holders ppl dont want to intentionally sandbag the dao units they own to not compete with other ppl most of the players own alot of dao units why keep downward preasure we need to throw gas on it and increase cash flow pay distributiions and in years this thing will be able to run even without a game for cash flow since it will have built a war chest of non correlated spl assets for at least 50% and gaming assets that produce cash flow like nodes, cards to rent out, staked sps it delegates to players to earn money , hive and hbd to maximize curation by voting on dao unit holders posts based onthere stake weight which lets ppl benefit from all the author and curation votes bc the dao nav increases by the curation and author vote from probably a large amount of hive especially if we run a wittness which would deff get the votes bc who would not switch form a wittness they get no income from to a wittness node that all income goes to increase the nav of the sps unit. Getting a cash cannon in this thing will be the best thing bc it can then support any proposal or game tweak with out breaking the bank or huring a return or basic income for investors. If it competes it competes it will be better for many ppl who dont know howto do some of the things and gives them a way to benefit from it and support the dao that beneifts them indirectly rather than give profits to other ppl i would rather give it to the dao bc it increases my nav