The ONLY reason I'm voting for this is that the team has been slacking in the balancing department. I would not WANT the DAO to HAVE to step in, but when the team does not do its job properly the DAO is the safety net.
Tofu falls into the same category and really rubs me the wrong way. The most played and OP L summoner and it has THREE added abilities/buffs while the other summoners only have TWO. That is HORRIBLY unbalanced and unfair to the other summoner winners. In fact it's making the game less fun because spamming tofu has become almost mandatory.
Kitty is still the best card in the game. The only advantage Tofu has is that it's playable in modern.
I saw that Tofu was released and I felt the card was very good and I bought it (10 copies plus 1 from airdrop). I made a good decision. I thought Nidhoggr wasn't very good so I didn't buy it. It did increase price a bit though.
Players need to make choices. Changing cards after they are printed is not the type of choice they should be making.
Tofu set one of the worst precedentsin the game. It is clearly out of balance with the rest of the summoners. Why on earth does it have an extra ability??? And the win rate shows this is ridiculous. It's OP with thorns, get RID of snare and it at least falls in line with the other summoners on paper.
This proposal is trying to set a much worse precedent which is not only changing a card after its released but it's setting it by a DAO vote.
I have bought Tofu because I thought it was a good card to have. I don't buy every card. Why should I be punished for buying a card that I thought was good? Again, we never nerfed Kitty, which is still the most OP card in the game and harder to counter/circumvent (in most rule sets) than Tofu.