You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: XBOT's stance on Battle helper (Proposal 8470)

in Splinterlands • last year

I know at least 2 methods (as a human player) that can indentify battle helper usage with high enough probability for most cases.

Not sure about Byz but maybe:

  1. He is busy
  2. He decided it's not worth his time to reply if you ignore most of his arguments, he spent enough time posting comments here already
  3. He didn't visit peakd blog
  4. He decided to not tell you
last year in Splinterlands by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 1
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     last year  

    I did respond to some of his argument above.
    Also notice that he copy-pasted his wall-of-text as a reply to my post, without replying to anything I said.

    I decided to focus on his point about knowing many methods of detection.

    Why would he not want to share the methods?
    With the anti-bot proposal we knew the methods of detection (Cloudfare).

    As a community we need to know what measures will go in place, otherwise we can get banned without any explanation.

    I'm not asking for an in-depth explanation. A name would be enough..

    Or you think even knowing the name would compromise it? It doesn't sound like a very good method if simply knowing its name would make it ineffective..

    $0.00
      Reply