I think that such proposal is quite good. Getting some money from players but at least ensuring liquidity and engagement from players.
It's a good form to "self-fund" and then be responsible of how players are paying fees.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not really. This is done actually to destroy competition.
DAO is well funded, there is no shortage of funds.
Why you say that? I mean, if anyone taking part is involved into the funding of the DAO, wouldn't make all the people more responsible and balance more (and eventually reward deserving users)?
You are missing the point. This has nothing to do with the DAO. If this passes, it make third party sites, which provides a lot of value to the ecosystem, rather unprofitable.