Apart from the challenges promoted by the Splinterlands team, any attempt to obtain curation or a fixed voting public is almost laborious and often without a positive result. There are countless Splinterlands players who barely know how the Hive ecosystem really works, or even the need to have CR for some in-game transactions. (That is, remembering that on some occasions the game itself delegated a generous amount to complete some rentals or in-game transactions).
So the question remains, is Splinterlands bigger than Hive?
You know your last statement reminded me about something I saw at the recent DNC convention in Chicago! But never mind that :)
The question is not who is bigger or smaller.
The question is since both are at the same place how can we improve the relationship and interaction.
I do agree with your comment on receiving curation at hive, I think the blame can be directed both ways. However, we are not planning to playing the blame game.
Please let me know how I personally can help folks like you.
It would be interesting to try it like other Blockchains, even if Hive isn't just for that. Similar to what happens on the Arbitrum network perhaps? Where events sometimes share the same prize pool and focus between Arbitrum, which is Ethereum's second layer, and other games also powered by the Ethereum network.
Perhaps a campaign on Galxe, or Zealy if you prefer. We can't just invite people to use Hive and expect them to settle for pennies or, if they're lucky, dollars.
You can check what I'm talking about in the posts on #introduceyourself , not everyone gets the positive vote to begin with. It seems that only women get it. Strangely so.
@azircon