You bring up some interesting points, and being relatively new to the game (just one year in) I was previously unaware of several of them. One thing you didn't cover, though, and it concerns me even more than the possibility of Splinterlands dying - what are the odds that when regulators have their attention snagged by the SPL snafu, they wind up realizing there's this whole other thriving blockchain that they've never even heard of...and decide to regulate it out of existence?
!PIZZA
!PIMP
I did not cover that, best not to panic before panic is due as they say. But it is true, SPL's bad exposure grants exposure to HIVE in it's fledgling state. What does that mean for the ecosystem overall when the exposure is from this and not something positive? Thanks for coming by and great comment. !PIZZA !PIMP
Well shit @cryptoniusrex, this post is older than 7 Days days.
Please try PIMPin' a different post.
(We will not send this error message for 24 hours).
Read about some PIMP Shit or Look for the PIMP District
You must be killin' it out here!
@willendorfia just slapped you with 1.000 PIMP, @cryptoniusrex.
You earned 1.000 PIMP for the strong hand.
They're getting a workout and slapped 1/2 possible people today.
Read about some PIMP Shit or Look for the PIMP District