It's skewed because they had a very low first month rate. The later months are compared to the first, in order to make it more directly comparable to the rest of the stats I have used. This can be skewed when users take more than a month to become active after joining, such as happened for this account's onboarded users as well as @steemmonsters in the post yesterday.
I cap it at 100% rather than let the outlier push up the vertical axis in any charts.
Ahh okay makes sense, thought it meant 100% of onboarded users became active the 2nd month at first which doesn't make sense to begin with since that number represents total accounts they onboarded til today.
It's skewed because they had a very low first month rate. The later months are compared to the first, in order to make it more directly comparable to the rest of the stats I have used. This can be skewed when users take more than a month to become active after joining, such as happened for this account's onboarded users as well as @steemmonsters in the post yesterday.
I cap it at 100% rather than let the outlier push up the vertical axis in any charts.
Ahh okay makes sense, thought it meant 100% of onboarded users became active the 2nd month at first which doesn't make sense to begin with since that number represents total accounts they onboarded til today.