The scope of the proposal is to bring active users, not investors. Investing comes with time, nobody arrives on any ecosystem and buys in on day one. Changing the goal posts to draw attention to factors that are not the scope of the proposal to shine a negative light on something is intelligent yet sneaky, but simply incorrect.
What good is a new account if that account doesn't invest and contribute to the ecosystem positively?
Again, this comes with time. If we want investors and positive contributors, we first need to bring in users. No new users = No new investors. Simple.
Irrelevant as well.
Ad hominem arguments do not take away any validity to my point.
Get lost from my blog...Please.
Next time I won't say please.
So, accurately reporting your acts is an ad hominem? Good to know.
He is doing so to undermine my argument.
If the facts undermine your argument, it's your argument that's the fallacy.
🤣 ok bro