Introduction
Every Friday, I'm hoping to publish the top 20 Hivers, rated by reputation. The data are provided by HiveBuzz.
Rankings
Rank | Change | Name | Reputation | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | @hbd.funder | 99.64 | +0.02 |
2 | 0 | @buildawhale | 88.84 | +0.07 |
3 | 0 | @haejin | 85.53 | 0.00 |
4 | 0 | @taskmaster4450 | 85.51 | +0.01 |
5 | 0 | @oflyhigh | 85.10 | +0.02 |
6 | 0 | @tarazkp | 85.03 | +0.01 |
7 | 0 | @ocd | 84.71 | 0.00 |
8 | 0 | @chbartist | 83.60 | 0.00 |
9 | 0 | @poshtoken | 83.13 | +0.02 |
10 | 0 | @steemcleaners | 83.01 | 0.00 |
11 | 0 | @galenkp | 82.99 | +0.02 |
12 | 0 | @gooddream | 82.82 | 0.00 |
13 | +1 | @edicted | 82.82 | +0.02 |
14 | -1 | @burnpost | 82.82 | 0.00 |
15 | 0 | @acidyo | 82.81 | +0.02 |
16 | 0 | @deanliu | 80.63 | 0.00 |
17 | 0 | @cryptoandcoffee | 85.56 | +0.02 |
18 | 0 | @jrcornel | 81.96 | 0.00 |
19 | 0 | @kingscrown | 81.91 | 0.00 |
20 | 0 | @khaleelkazi | 81.78 | +0.03 |
Conclusions
- No one dropped out of the top 20 this week.
- Two Hivers swapped their rankings.
- All reputation changes were positive.
If you don't want to receive 'mentioned' notifications, please leave a comment and I'll remove your name's @ .
Some of those people have been inactive for a long time, so their reputation may not change. I may get to 80 in a year or more.
These people may drop out over a very long time. Do you think they should be mentioned? If so, I don't know how to get the info. I think you will get to 80 sooner than a year.
Just thought - I could add a 'Weeks Without Charge' column and gradually build up the data.
I don't think rep changes if you are inactive. It takes me at least a year to go up by one and it just gets harder to increase. Inactive or unchanged time would be useful.
Thanks, I appreciate your experienced advice.