This is especially vexing to me recently because I'm looking at LBRY, a platform that EXCLUSIVELY uses this and they are being covered more favorably than Steem.
LBRY also solved a bunch of other problems with UX design that steem has still yet to properly solve even in the beta version of the new UI. Honestly, steems voting system is pretty good, it just encourages weird behavior in its current design.
I would suggest that in order for peoples full voting power to be reached they the overall number of upvotes need to be accounted for. You should not even be close to reaching 100% of your collective voting power unless you are at least in the top 1000 most upvoted posts on the platform for that 24 hour schedule.
Yea, some notable things are the bounties for new users completing simple initial steps, I think that's really good. The experience there just feels really connected. I've mentioned before it seems like on Steem people focus on solving one problem, which is a strength on one hand, but the flaw is everything is so disconnected that if you're new everything feels like an incomplete product.
Having a hard time wrapping my head around this. So instead of your VP being on a timer, it would fill based on how many upvotes you get?