The battle of right of possession of firearms is something I am honestly not familiar with seeing as I have neither had the need for one nor felt the urge to own or handle one.
I have been accosted at an ATM before and although I don't know if having a small hand gun would have helped or anything but perhaps it would have given me a sense of safety.
Although I understand everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, the name calling was definitely uncalled for. Perhaps he has had a personal or close experience with its effects or what not for him to act that way?
Who knows why that chap said what he said, but the fact that's all he really had at the end, insults, indicates all I need to know. It doesn't bother me; I've been called far worse, by far better than he.
I agree.
Perhaps if he had presented his facts or opinions in a clear concise and precise manner, it would have been easier to see things from his perspective rather than blow up like that
Yeah, I think you're right.