No, rocksdb is currently only used by account_history_rocksdb (which is deprecated in favor of sql_serializer). But despite the deprecation, account_history_rocksdb will probably be used for a long time just because it takes less resources than a full HAF database. And there's also a possibility to use it for a better version of something like MIRA eventually (i.e. to store more data that is currently stored in chainbase).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, yes, yes. Comment index and all account related data should be kept in RocksDB, as that constitutes vast majority of state consumption while only small fraction of it is needed at any given time.