Been there, done that. And of course you are 100% right.
It's just that I prefer bigger set of reliable nodes than a smaller set of high performance clusters. Of course both are needed, but spending money wisely, I would rather say that it's up to the dapps, so when they scale up, they also contribute to a decentralized infrastructure. That way it will grow organically with the projects themselves.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I wholeheartedly agree. dApps themselves having their own nodes, or even clusters, preferably in different parts of the world, would definitely be the way to go. But unfortunately, not everyone has the expertise (even though there's help), the funding to cover the costs (even though overall requirements went down in the last two HFs), nor the willingness to handle such an undertaking. If the proposal gets funded, the end goal is to have more nodes in more parts of the world, serving different populations.
In all honesty, the proposal itself is simply a case of: