Cool, keen to hear when you've had some chance to think more about it.
One thing I myself am quite interested in is allowing communities to experiment with different economic models. I'm not talking about SMTs, although of course they will come later and allow even more experimentation. But what if a community owner account can be set as the mandatory beneficiary of 100% of the rewards generated in that community? Maybe those who are solely interested in the rewards will not participate, or maybe they will, depending on what the community decides to do with the rewards (e.g. a local group can have monthly parties paid for by the community's rewards, etc.). How will people's behavior in that community be different if they don't personally seek to maximize their rewards or even participate for the rewards? Hive without the rewards seems like an interesting experiment which I think can easily be tried with some additions to Hivemind.
Cool, keen to hear when you've had some chance to think more about it.
One thing I myself am quite interested in is allowing communities to experiment with different economic models. I'm not talking about SMTs, although of course they will come later and allow even more experimentation. But what if a community owner account can be set as the mandatory beneficiary of 100% of the rewards generated in that community? Maybe those who are solely interested in the rewards will not participate, or maybe they will, depending on what the community decides to do with the rewards (e.g. a local group can have monthly parties paid for by the community's rewards, etc.). How will people's behavior in that community be different if they don't personally seek to maximize their rewards or even participate for the rewards? Hive without the rewards seems like an interesting experiment which I think can easily be tried with some additions to Hivemind.