You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Proposal: Hive Developer Documentation (Q2 2020)

in HiveDevs5 years ago

Hi Inertia. TBH I find the amount super high for adjusting the current docs (find Steem replace hive). Undoubtly you spend a lot of time when working for Steemit Inc to setup these docs (and possibly maintain them) and they are very valuable, so I don't want to discredit you at all and it would be great if you want to take up on the task of rewording them and maintaining them.

However ....

  1. I find it odd (to say the least) you say you did some "initial rebranding on the landing page - developers.hive.io" were you in reality so far had only pushed 2 changes in the configs for RubyGems on the develop branch which is obviously not production branch (which I had setup, connected with auto-build and deploy on Amazon). All the changes prior to those 2 small ones by you had been submitted and pushed by me in the production environment. In other words: I did those changes to the landing page.
  2. I also find it odd you say you are "basically hosting the documentation" where in the past weeks prior to the official Hive launch made sure to have a Master/Develop branching, automatic build & deploy with Amazon S3 & cache invalidation. And guess what: That S3 bill is going to my creditcard...

Why am I posting this? I don't want any credit for "work" I did in setting up this devportal deploy environment or any of other work I did related to it prior to the Hive launch and past week. Yet I don't like it you are now taking credit of stuff that I did. That's a lie and you know this. I would really appreciate openness and honesty, especially in regards to community funding. I hope the above statements by your are somehow a mistake, yet I find it hard to believe. If this announcement already contains these (for me) grave lies I find it hard to believe the documentation work and transparency around the usage of potential community funds will be done in fairness.

Sort:  
 5 years ago (edited) 

Sorry for the confusion. The initial rebranding I’m referring to is reflected on my initial repository that I set up prior to my discovery of developers.hive.io. That initial work is here:

https://hive.blog/hive-139531/@inertia/q7v2b2

Unfortunately, I failed to update the paragraph in my proposal where I mention the hosting. I’ll update that as soon as possible.

I wasn’t using anything elaborate, which is why it slipped my mind. I just registered hivedocs.info (now obsolete) and intended to use Github Pages, which is very low cost.

Hi Inertia, ok cool thanks that clears things up. See if you can merge any of the CSS styling / rebranding you did into the Gitlab too then and or compare branches... Note that the developmaster, which is a "protected" branch. branch automatically builds & deploys to https://developers-staging.hive.io . Once you are happy production can be build & deployed via a merge into

Perfect. I merged my hivedocs.info rebranding ideas to the staging devportal. I guess maybe we can do some A/B testing?


A: https://developers.hive.io/ B: http://developers-staging.hive.io/

Ha, thats a no-brainer.... B ofcourse :)