680MB -> 58MB, 90% reduction. Not bad! Use less storage and save some compute, probably speed up builds too. Overall lower cost of ownership. Nice work, @engrave!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
680MB -> 58MB, 90% reduction. Not bad! Use less storage and save some compute, probably speed up builds too. Overall lower cost of ownership. Nice work, @engrave!
Build time will be actually a bit longer because of the multi-stage process but it's worth reducing space and transfer :)